Am 04.11.2011 14:50, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Hi guys,
> I didn't use this ever, it was just put to extra because of kernel
> support for it.
> Anyone who wants it?
> Should we remove it from the extra repo?
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Removed from extra, noone is interested anymore in mainting it.
g
Am 23.11.2011 20:13, schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here is a little status update. So far I have issued 67 signatures in
>> total for 36 Developers and Trusted Users. 10 people haven't reported
>> back and another 11 haven't even mana
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a little status update. So far I have issued 67 signatures in
> total for 36 Developers and Trusted Users. 10 people haven't reported
> back and another 11 haven't even managed to publish their key yet.
>
> I created a g
Am 23.11.2011 17:12, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a little status update. So far I have issued 67 signatures in
> total for 36 Developers and Trusted Users. 10 people haven't reported
> back and another 11 haven't even managed to publish their key yet.
>
> I created a graph of ou
Hi all,
here is a little status update. So far I have issued 67 signatures in
total for 36 Developers and Trusted Users. 10 people haven't reported
back and another 11 haven't even managed to publish their key yet.
I created a graph of our web of trust as it looks now (using sig2dot;
thanks Dan):
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 10 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 8 fully signed off packages
* 11 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
6 matches
Mail list logo
