On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> Seems like we need to build netcf with libnl3, since libvirt links to
> both libnetcf and libpcap (already built against libnl3).
>
> Also see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651033 .
>
> Too bad Ubuntu's netcf is so far remov
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl
> 3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos,
> 0.1.9 upstream).
>
> Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't apply to the
> upstream 0.1.
Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl
3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos,
0.1.9 upstream).
Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't apply to the
upstream 0.1.9 sources.
I'd rather have this handled properly instead of just
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 19 fully signed off packages
* 65 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
4 matches
Mail list logo