Re: [arch-dev-public] netcf and the libnl rebuild

2012-02-11 Thread Jan Steffens
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > Seems like we need to build netcf with libnl3, since libvirt links to > both libnetcf and libpcap (already built against libnl3). > > Also see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651033 . > > Too bad Ubuntu's netcf is so far remov

Re: [arch-dev-public] netcf and the libnl rebuild

2012-02-11 Thread Jan Steffens
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl > 3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos, > 0.1.9 upstream). > > Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't apply to the > upstream 0.1.

[arch-dev-public] netcf and the libnl rebuild

2012-02-11 Thread Jan Steffens
Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl 3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos, 0.1.9 upstream). Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't apply to the upstream 0.1.9 sources. I'd rather have this handled properly instead of just

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2012-02-11 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 19 fully signed off packages * 65 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: