Re: [arch-dev-public] linux 3.4.1 ready for [core]?

2012-06-09 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-06-10 02:08:13 +0200] Jan Steffens: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel series? > > > > greetings > > tpowa > > > > -- > > Tobias Powalowski > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintai

Re: [arch-dev-public] linux 3.4.1 ready for [core]?

2012-06-09 Thread Jan Steffens
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel series? > > greetings > tpowa > > -- > Tobias Powalowski > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > http://www.archlinux.org > tp...@archlinux.org 3.

Re: [arch-dev-public] linux 3.4.1 ready for [core]?

2012-06-09 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Jun 9, 2012 2:03 PM, "Andreas Radke" wrote: > > Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:14:02 +0200 > schrieb Tobias Powalowski : > > > > > -Dan > > Dan Andy has this issue with 3.3.x too, so this is not a show stopper. > > greetings > > tpowa > > > > No. With 3.3.x all is fine! It is introduced by 3.4.0. But w

Re: [arch-dev-public] linux 3.4.1 ready for [core]?

2012-06-09 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:14:02 +0200 schrieb Tobias Powalowski : > > -Dan > Dan Andy has this issue with 3.3.x too, so this is not a show stopper. > greetings > tpowa > No. With 3.3.x all is fine! It is introduced by 3.4.0. But whoever has NFSv4 can still use 3.0.x LTS kernels like I do now. So i

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2012-06-09 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 9 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 14 fully signed off packages * 26 packages missing signoffs * 10 packages older than 14 days (Note: