[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2012-08-26 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 7 fully signed off packages * 57 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days (Note:

Re: [arch-dev-public] merging systemd back to a singular package

2012-08-26 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 05:15:39PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: Hi, I apologize for this being somewhat after-the-fact. It was discussed on IRC, but that of course doesn't necessarily cater to a wide enough audience. Some of you have probably already noticed that systemd 189 now provides,

Re: [arch-dev-public] squid open bugs

2012-08-26 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-08-25 12:42:00 +0200] Jelle van der Waa: The current squid package is orphan, has 3 bugs on our tracker and is out of date atm. [...] Note that I don't insist anyone to fix it or that I want to maintain it. I just had some time to spare. Shall we move squid and dansguardian to the

[arch-dev-public] package move request

2012-08-26 Thread keenerd
There are several orphan packages I'd like to maintain, currently in [extra]. python-imaging gqview htop multitail catdoc fortune-mod Of these python-imaging is probably the most serious. Lots of packages depend on it, but these all are in community. Two packages in extra optdep it: hplip and

Re: [arch-dev-public] package move request

2012-08-26 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-08-26 21:50:37 -0400] keenerd: gqview How about we drop it? It has been unmaintained upstream for the past five years, which is why a fork (geeqie) was created two years ago. Geeqie is alive and well in our repos, and there is little point in packaging deprecated software like gqview. No