[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2012-08-29 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 11 fully signed off packages * 39 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in postgresql/repos (testing-x86_64)

2012-08-29 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Monday 27 August 2012 08:27:05 you wrote: Date: Monday, August 27, 2012 @ 08:27:05 Author: heftig Revision: 165625 db-remove: postgresql removed by heftig Deleted: postgresql/repos/testing-x86_64/ Can we know why this has been removed? Should I (users) downgrade? Is 9.1.4-2

[arch-dev-public] Xulrunner

2012-08-29 Thread Jan Steffens
Can we drop xulrunner to the AUR? Or does a TU want to maintain it in [community]? freewrl has multiple options on which spidermonkey implementation to use, so it probably should depend the js package instead. I believe the packages building browser plugins can use the Firefox development files

Re: [arch-dev-public] package move request

2012-08-29 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-08-26 21:50:37 -0400] keenerd: There are several orphan packages I'd like to maintain, currently in [extra]. So I just moved python-imaging, multitail, catdoc, and fortune-mod to [community], dropped gqview to the AUR, and left htop in [extra] since Dave adopted it. Cheers. -- Gaetan

Re: [arch-dev-public] squid open bugs

2012-08-29 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-08-27 10:09:05 +1000] Gaetan Bisson: [2012-08-25 12:42:00 +0200] Jelle van der Waa: The current squid package is orphan, has 3 bugs on our tracker and is out of date atm. [...] Note that I don't insist anyone to fix it or that I want to maintain it. I just had some time to

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xulrunner

2012-08-29 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le mercredi 29 août 2012 13:06:15 Jan Steffens a écrit : Can we drop xulrunner to the AUR? Or does a TU want to maintain it in [community]? freewrl has multiple options on which spidermonkey implementation to use, so it probably should depend the js package instead. I believe the packages

[arch-dev-public] systemd units for ppp and watchdog

2012-08-29 Thread Thomas Bächler
While creating systemd units for my packages, I found two problems: 1) I cannot force pppd fork to the background. While it is the default behaviour, the user can override that with the 'nodetach' and 'updetach' configuration options. Should I use Type=simple and force the 'nodetach' option on

Re: [arch-dev-public] systemd units for ppp and watchdog

2012-08-29 Thread Jan Steffens
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: While creating systemd units for my packages, I found two problems: 1) I cannot force pppd fork to the background. While it is the default behaviour, the user can override that with the 'nodetach' and 'updetach'

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in postgresql/repos (testing-x86_64)

2012-08-29 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:57:56PM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote: On Monday 27 August 2012 08:27:05 you wrote: Date: Monday, August 27, 2012 @ 08:27:05 Author: heftig Revision: 165625 db-remove: postgresql removed by heftig Deleted: postgresql/repos/testing-x86_64/