Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 24.02.2013 23:31, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-02-24 17:16:42 +0100] Sven-Hendrik Haase: +1 for moving mesa quickly Do you have any more arguments than Andreas gave to support this? Or is the "+1" entirely for free? Moving it quickly would seem like the simplest solution and the bugs I he

Re: [arch-dev-public] Please provide Info for my talk!

2013-02-24 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/02/13 00:34, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> I am giving an hour long talk at the end of next week about Arch, how it >> works and why we are successful. I will focus on stuff I am involved >> with (i.e. pacman...), but will give examples of thi

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-02-24 17:16:42 +0100] Sven-Hendrik Haase: > +1 for moving mesa quickly Do you have any more arguments than Andreas gave to support this? Or is the "+1" entirely for free? -- Gaetan pgpPaSMF9uXwn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Allan McRae
On 25/02/13 01:40, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:41:08 +1100 > schrieb Gaetan Bisson : > >> [2013-02-23 10:23:13 +0100] Andreas Radke: >>> There are still packages in extra depending on the old libgl >>> package. We will need to fix them before makepkg will properly >>> allow to bu

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 24.02.2013 16:40, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:41:08 +1100 > schrieb Gaetan Bisson : > >> [2013-02-23 10:23:13 +0100] Andreas Radke: >>> There are still packages in extra depending on the old libgl >>> package. We will need to fix them before makepkg will properly >>> allow to b

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:41:08 +1100 schrieb Gaetan Bisson : > [2013-02-23 10:23:13 +0100] Andreas Radke: > > There are still packages in extra depending on the old libgl > > package. We will need to fix them before makepkg will properly > > allow to build only against new mesa. > > With [testing]

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le dimanche 24 février 2013 22:41:08 Gaetan Bisson a écrit : > [2013-02-23 10:23:13 +0100] Andreas Radke: > > There are still packages in extra depending on the old libgl package. We > > will need to fix them before makepkg will properly allow to build only > > against new mesa. > > With [testing]

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing

2013-02-24 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-02-23 10:23:13 +0100] Andreas Radke: > There are still packages in extra depending on the old libgl package. We > will need to fix them before makepkg will properly allow to build only > against new mesa. With [testing] enabled, `pacman -S libgl` still pulls the old libgl, rather than mesa-l

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-02-24 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 10 fully signed off packages * 45 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: