On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:20:55 +0100
> schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just uploaded a new installer image. I did not write any
>> announcement for the last two. Some people were asking for a news
>> item. What is your opinion on t
Am 25.02.2013 18:27, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Am 20.02.2013 18:50, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
>> Hi,
>> I built the kernel, now there are issues with nvidia, lirc and propably
>> other binary modules,
>> Do you want the kernel already in testing or should I place it somewhere
>> else for the maint
Am Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:20:55 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded a new installer image. I did not write any
> announcement for the last two. Some people were asking for a news
> item. What is your opinion on this? Should we post announcements even
> if there are no exciti
Le vendredi 1 mars 2013 07:54:20 Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> the multilib repo had different entries for packages in the db and
> files databases. It would be great to know how you manged to do this.
> Please never alter the files directly as this will always break things!
>
> I removed the
Hi all,
I just uploaded a new installer image. I did not write any announcement
for the last two. Some people were asking for a news item. What is your
opinion on this? Should we post announcements even if there are no
exciting changes? I could also generate a list of updated packages that
are ava
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 11 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 11 fully signed off packages
* 171 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note
6 matches
Mail list logo