Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.14 hitting testing

2013-03-16 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 16.03.2013 17:48, Laurent Carlier wrote: > Le samedi 16 mars 2013 10:05:54 Andreas Radke a écrit : >> Am Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:27:16 +0100 >> >> schrieb Laurent Carlier : >>> Users will have to wait until a compatible version is available. Mesa >>> drivers are an alternative, or they can block the

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-16 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 14 March 2013 03:35, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. >> Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding >> makedepends. So it seems th

Re: [arch-dev-public] Arch Linux Trademark Violation

2013-03-16 Thread Xyne
Ionut Biru wrote: >On 03/16/2013 07:13 PM, Xyne wrote: > >> > >I appreciate your effort but this stuff should be discussed internally >and not publicly. > >Usually Aaron takes care about stuff like that and Allan emailed him >about it already. I wasn't expecting a discussion here. I don't have a

Re: [arch-dev-public] Arch Linux Trademark Violation

2013-03-16 Thread Ionut Biru
On 03/16/2013 07:13 PM, Xyne wrote: > I appreciate your effort but this stuff should be discussed internally and not publicly. Usually Aaron takes care about stuff like that and Allan emailed him about it already. -- Ionuț signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-dev-public] Arch Linux Trademark Violation

2013-03-16 Thread Xyne
Hi, kynikos on the forum has discovered a flagrant violation of the trademarked Arch Linux logo: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=159730 The original message for those of you too lazy to follow the forum link: > I'd like to report the following as possible violations of the Arch Linux

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.14 hitting testing

2013-03-16 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le samedi 16 mars 2013 10:05:54 Andreas Radke a écrit : > Am Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:27:16 +0100 > > schrieb Laurent Carlier : > > Users will have to wait until a compatible version is available. Mesa > > drivers are an alternative, or they can block the upgrade. > > > > ++ > > I'd like to move Xorg 1.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.14 hitting testing

2013-03-16 Thread Ionut Biru
On 03/16/2013 12:09 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 16.03.2013 10:05, schrieb Andreas Radke: >> I'd like to move Xorg 1.14 pretty soon, best would be together with >> the kernels. It's up to you whether you want to announce to hold the >> update for catalyst users or remove it from the repos. > > I

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.14 hitting testing

2013-03-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 16.03.2013 10:05, schrieb Andreas Radke: > I'd like to move Xorg 1.14 pretty soon, best would be together with > the kernels. It's up to you whether you want to announce to hold the > update for catalyst users or remove it from the repos. I just noticed that Virtualbox does not work with the la

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.14 hitting testing

2013-03-16 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:27:16 +0100 schrieb Laurent Carlier : > Users will have to wait until a compatible version is available. Mesa > drivers are an alternative, or they can block the upgrade. > > ++ I'd like to move Xorg 1.14 pretty soon, best would be together with the kernels. It's up to you

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-03-16 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 37 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 16 fully signed off packages * 173 packages missing signoffs * 9 packages older than 14 days (Note