Re: [arch-dev-public] licensing issues with DB 6.0

2013-08-09 Thread Andreas Radke
I suggest the quick solution to drop the db v6 rebuild and stay with old db 5.3.21 to be on the safe side. We should check all packages on the rebuild list if they can be build without linking to Berkeley db at all (new Todo list). Maybe that way we can move db in a first step to extra and drop

Re: [arch-dev-public] licensing issues with DB 6.0

2013-08-09 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 09.08.2013 19:54, schrieb Andreas Radke: > After some reading the AGPLv3 license is not different from GPLv3 > with one addition. Since many services now run in the cloud in AGPLv3 > this is also covered as "distribution" of the code and must be done > under the same rights that GPLv3 would requ

Re: [arch-dev-public] licensing issues with DB 6.0

2013-08-09 Thread Andreas Radke
After some reading the AGPLv3 license is not different from GPLv3 with one addition. Since many services now run in the cloud in AGPLv3 this is also covered as "distribution" of the code and must be done under the same rights that GPLv3 would require when shipping software as binary builds via some

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community, multilib 09-08-2013

2013-08-09 Thread repomaint
Warning : the repository multilib does not exist in /srv/abs/rsync/any === = Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community,multilib = === Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkg

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 09-08-2013

2013-08-09 Thread repomaint
= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> che

Re: [arch-dev-public] licensing issues with DB 6.0

2013-08-09 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 9 August 2013 11:31, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, > > we just finished the db 6.0 rebuild in staging. I was pointed* to an > issue with it's license though. It seems Oracle switched the license to > AGPL with version 6.0. I am not an expert, but afaik this makes it only > compatible with GPL

[arch-dev-public] licensing issues with DB 6.0

2013-08-09 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Hi all, we just finished the db 6.0 rebuild in staging. I was pointed* to an issue with it's license though. It seems Oracle switched the license to AGPL with version 6.0. I am not an expert, but afaik this makes it only compatible with GPL3 clients and also enforces the AGPL terms on those. Debi

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-08-09 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 2 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 3 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: th