Re: [arch-dev-public] moving libpaper to extra / new (Calligra/LibO) Office related libs

2014-01-22 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:03:14 +0100 schrieb Jelle van der Waa : > It totally makes sense to create packages for libraries which are > used in Calligra and LibreOffice. Creating packages for obscure > libraries used only in LibreOffice seems like an unnecessary maintain > burden, I just wonder why y

Re: [arch-dev-public] drift between repo packages and ABS

2014-01-22 Thread Allan McRae
On 23/01/14 05:14, Dave Reisner wrote: > I won't be tracking down individual > people to fix these, but please do a pkgrel bump and fix these when you > get a chance. These deserve tracked down... > [community] > rt3562sta - depends > madman - depends > kiwi - depends Seriously! Bad packager!

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving libpaper to extra / new (Calligra/LibO) Office related libs

2014-01-22 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 01/22/14 at 08:54am, Andreas Radke wrote: > I'd like to make use of libpaper in Ghostscript, Cups and LibreOffice. > So I will move it to extra and will maintain it there. > > Also I was told that Callibre can make use of certain libraries in > future versions that are already part of the inter

[arch-dev-public] drift between repo packages and ABS

2014-01-22 Thread Dave Reisner
Hi, I've noticed that there's a significant number of packages which show drift between the repo package and the PKGBUILD in ABS. This occurs because devs/TUs update the PKGBUILD in SVN and call archrelease (or one of its derivatives such as extrapkg) without releasing the package to the repos. I

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2014-01-22 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 6 fully signed off packages * 38 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: