Re: [arch-dev-public] cleaning up the gid/uid mess

On 09/08/14 01:07 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 09/08/14 14:53, Daniel Micay wrote: >> The current strategy for handling this involves reserving ids for every >> package needing users / groups and tracking it on the wiki. The wiki >> doesn't actually correspond well to the state of packages in the >>

Re: [arch-dev-public] cleaning up the gid/uid mess

On 09/08/14 14:53, Daniel Micay wrote: > The current strategy for handling this involves reserving ids for every > package needing users / groups and tracking it on the wiki. The wiki > doesn't actually correspond well to the state of packages in the > repositories, as it's missing quite a few user

[arch-dev-public] cleaning up the gid/uid mess

The current strategy for handling this involves reserving ids for every package needing users / groups and tracking it on the wiki. The wiki doesn't actually correspond well to the state of packages in the repositories, as it's missing quite a few users / groups and has plenty that are not used by

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community, multilib 08-08-2014

Warning : the repository multilib does not exist in /srv/abs/rsync/any === = Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community,multilib = === Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkg

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 08-08-2014

= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> che

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 9 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 13 fully signed off packages * 37 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: