On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> What I would be inclined to accept would be that packages are, at least at
> first, always
> co-maintained by sponsor and sponsored TU. This way we can assure that new
> TU's can handle
> ll the tasks related to maintaining a package. C
Em maio 23, 2017 17:23 Bartłomiej Piotrowski escreveu:
One of the problems I keep hearing about is that there is no clear place
where potential contributors could start. Sure, some things seem obvious
to us: take care of some wiki article or adopt orphan AUR packages. It
isn't actually that easy
[2017-05-23 22:23:51 +0200] Bartłomiej Piotrowski:
> Another thing that I heard in last few months isthat it is actually hard
> for potential TU candidates to find a sponsor. While I believe it is
> perfectly fine to e-mail few potential sponsors to ask for opinion,
> throwing random messages at pe
Hi all,
Spending some time outside the regular Arch circles, I realized that the
way we "outreach" potential contributors is at least imperfect.
One of the problems I keep hearing about is that there is no clear place
where potential contributors could start. Sure, some things seem obvious
to us:
On 2017-05-23 12:59, Christian Hesse wrote:
> The main change is the library rename from `libmysqlclient.so` to
> `libmariadb.so`. I would like to rename our package from `libmariadbclient`
> to just `libmariadb`. Any objections?
None from my side. I guess that SONAME field will be different from
Hello everybody,
MariaDB 10.2.6 has just been released, being the latest stable release as of
now. As we have API/ABI changes we need a rebuild of depending packages.
The main change is the library rename from `libmysqlclient.so` to
`libmariadb.so`. I would like to rename our package from `libmar
6 matches
Mail list logo
