> +1 for removing lcms1. I fixed the packages in the [community] repository.
> Someone else should fix packages in [extra], because I don't have access to
> this repository:
> - geeqie (FS#60091)
> - gimp (FS#60092)
> - xsane (FS#60090)
All fixed. lcms (and its lib32- and python2- derivatives) can
Balló György via arch-dev-public on Mon,
2018/09/17 11:15:
> Eric Bélanger (Snowman) was inactive as package maintainer in the past
> two years. [1][2] Is it possible to disown his packages on archweb? I
> think it would better to make it visible that his packages are actually
> orphan.
>
> https
ezt írta (időpont: 2018. szept. 17., H, 10:19):
> Christian Hesse schreef op 2018-09-14 21:18:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > we have packages lcms (which provides lcms 1.x) and lcms2. The former
> > is
> > flagged out-of-date every now and then for version 2.x... I would like
> > to
> > rename the
Eric Bélanger (Snowman) was inactive as package maintainer in the past
two years. [1][2] Is it possible to disown his packages on archweb? I
think it would better to make it visible that his packages are actually
orphan.
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/?qt=author&q=eric
https:/
Hi all,
Similar to my previous mail, I orphaned some of my packages which have
a dependency on libglade. Libglade is deprecated in favor of GtkBuilder
since 2009, [1] and does not receive any fixes since then. I would
propose to remove it from the official repositories.
The following packages wer
Christian Hesse schreef op 2018-09-14 21:18:
Hello everybody,
we have packages lcms (which provides lcms 1.x) and lcms2. The former
is
flagged out-of-date every now and then for version 2.x... I would like
to
rename the package to lcms1 with replace and provide for lcms. Any
concerns?
I don
6 matches
Mail list logo
