Re: [arch-dev-public] Merging dhclient and dhcp package

2010-01-17 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 17/01/2010, Daniel Isenmann wrote: > I have some problems in deleting the old dhclient svn directory. Can > someone please delete the dhclient svn directory? Not the package in > the package database, only the SVN directory with svn rm. Done. ...and like ever I committed my changes...uff I h

[arch-dev-public] monotone requires botan < 1.9

2010-01-16 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi DEVs, monotone 0.45, that is in [extra], needs botan 1.8.x to work. It is orphan too. So we have 3 choices now: - add botan18 to [extra] - move monotone to unsupported - (bad) build monotone with botan 1.8.x and add the depence with botan<1.9 What do you suggest? See FS#17297 for more. Thanks

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] dhcpcd 5.1.4

2010-01-12 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2010/1/7 Ronald van Haren : > Hi, > > in testing for both architectures, please signoff. signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] iodbc Vs unixodbc, are they compatible?

2010-01-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2010/1/11 Andrea Scarpino : > I saw the apr-util-iodbc in AUR, but it doesn't fully work as > explained in this[1] bug report. So seems they are not API compatible. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47879 forgot it. with libiodbc everything is fine.

Re: [arch-dev-public] iodbc Vs unixodbc, are they compatible?

2010-01-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2010/1/11 Pierre Schmitz : > Looks like there is nor real need for a conflict. I'll push a > non-conflicting libiodbc package to kde-unstable soon. these files are in both: /usr/include/odbcinst.h /usr/include/sql.h /usr/include/sqltypes.h /usr/include/sqlucode.h /usr/lib/libodbc.so I saw the apr-

[arch-dev-public] iodbc Vs unixodbc, are they compatible?

2010-01-10 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi DEVs, me and Pierre are building KDE 4.4 packages, but to provide the soprano virtuoso backend we need the iODBC driver that conflicts with unixODBC. The unixODBC in [extra] is required by 9 packages. We don't know if these two drivers are API compatible, so there is anyone that knows if we can

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.3-1

2010-01-08 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2010/1/8 Thomas Bächler : > Am 08.01.2010 09:06, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: >> Hi guys, >> bump to latest bugfix version. >> >> Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE >>

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib 1.2.3.4-1

2010-01-07 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/12/25 Pierre Schmitz : > Here comes a new minor update to the zlib package. > > Package changes: > * PKGBUILD cleanup > * use asm code for i686 and amd64 (might be insane ;-)) > * patched Makfile to install soname links and set correct permissions of > libz.a > > Note: As the zlib.net homepage

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] inetutils 1.7-1

2010-01-07 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2010/1/7 Eric Bélanger : > Anyone? > works fine. signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libldap 2.4.21-1

2010-01-07 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/12/21 Andrea Scarpino : > Minor upstream release, Changelog: > > OpenLDAP 2.4.21 Release (2009/12/20) >        Fixed liblutil for negative microsecond offsets (ITS#6405) >        Fixed slapd global settings to work without restart (ITS#6428) >        Fixed slapd lo

[arch-dev-public] Added category to Community project on flyspray

2009-12-22 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, I added "Packages: Testing" category to Community project on our flyspray. Sorry if I should ask first. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libldap 2.4.21-1

2009-12-21 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Minor upstream release, Changelog: OpenLDAP 2.4.21 Release (2009/12/20) Fixed liblutil for negative microsecond offsets (ITS#6405) Fixed slapd global settings to work without restart (ITS#6428) Fixed slapd looping with SSL/TLS connections (ITS#6412) Fixed slapd sync

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.2-1

2009-12-15 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 15/12/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > and an i686 please? signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libldap 2.4.20

2009-12-10 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 05/12/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > signoff i686 > Allan > please someone signoff for x86_64, thanks -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Punishment needed for not building in a chroot

2009-12-06 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/12/7 Giovanni Scafora : > I agree with Allan, all of us must always use ours development tools > and we must building in a clean chroot. I also am agree and I am peeved as you when I read avoidable (or stupid) bug reports. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Punishment needed for not building in a chroot

2009-12-06 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 07/12/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2009/12/6, Allan McRae : >> So, we need a creative punishment for those that causes bugs by not >> building in a clean chroot. It is too early in the morning for me to be >> creative so I am struggling to come up with ideas besides beatings and >> removal

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] heimdal-1.3.1 rebuilds

2009-12-05 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 05/12/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > Anyone for i686? > signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libldap 2.4.20

2009-11-30 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, minor upstream release. Changelog: OpenLDAP 2.4.20 Release (2009/11/27) Fixed client tools with LDAP options (ITS#6283) Fixed liblber embedded NUL values in BerValues (ITS#6353) Fixed liblber inverted LBER_USE_DER test (ITS#6348) Fixed liblber to return failure

Re: [arch-dev-public] signoff policy for "any" packages

2009-11-28 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 28/11/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > What is the signoff policy for "arch=any" packages? Do we still need > one for each architecture? Or just one. If one, should it be form the > opposite architecture it was built on? I think one signoff for each architecture is the right thing. -- Andrea `ba

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] rt2x00-rt61-fw - rt2x00-rt71w-fw switched to arch=any

2009-11-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 23/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Hi guys, > > please signoff. > > rt2x00-rt61-fw-1.2-4 > rt2x00-rt71w-fw-1.8-4 > > After signoffs, I will be moving them from testing to core. > Thanks. signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iwlwifi-xxxx-ucode switched to arch=any

2009-11-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 23/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Hi guys, > > please signoff those packages: > > iwlwifi-3945-ucode-15.32.2.9-2 > iwlwifi-4965-ucode-228.61.2.24-2 > iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.24.2.12-2 > iwlwifi-5150-ucode-8.24.2.2-2 > > After signoffs, I will be moving them from testing to core. > Thanks. sign

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ipw-xxxx-fw switched to arch=any

2009-11-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 23/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > ipw2100-fw-1.3-4 > ipw2200-fw-3.1-2 signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] tiacx-firmware-2-2-any switched to arch=any

2009-11-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 24/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Hi guys, > > please signoff: > > tiacx-firmware-2-2-any > > After signoff, I will be moving it from testing to core. > Thanks. signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] New firmware rt2870usb-fw-8-1-any

2009-11-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 24/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Hi guys, > > please signoff. > > rt2870usb-fw-8-1-any > > After signoffs, I will be moving it from testing to core. > > Note: see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16775 signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] New firmware ar9170-fw-1.0-1-any

2009-11-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 24/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Hi guys, > > please signoff. > > ar9170-fw-1.0-1-any > > After signoff, I will be moving it from testing to core. > > Note: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16837 signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] akonadi package splitted

2009-11-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 2009/11/23, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi DEVs, > I'd like to split akonadi into two packages: one for libs and one for > services. > I already did it in my local machine; I checked all kde-* packages, > digikam, kipi-plugins, konversation, koffice-* and none needs >

[arch-dev-public] akonadi package splitted

2009-11-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi DEVs, I'd like to split akonadi into two packages: one for libs and one for services. I already did it in my local machine; I checked all kde-* packages, digikam, kipi-plugins, konversation, koffice-* and none needs akonadi-server, so this update will broke nothing. Obviously people who use akon

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iwlwifi-1000-ucode-128.50.3.1-1-any

2009-11-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 23/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Please signoff signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1-1

2009-11-22 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 22/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Please signoff. signoff -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Out-of-Date orphans packages list

2009-11-21 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 22/11/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > nicotine nicotine (hugo) > beaver > libpthread-stubs > puzzles move to unsupported? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] Out-of-Date orphans packages list

2009-11-21 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, As you already know I am writing a list of ours orphans packages and a candidate maintainer for each. The list is really long (~980) and I haven't more time now (I lost two days for mysql too...). But I thought we can begin from out-of-date packages meantime. So: [extra] bash-completion - (aar

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 20-11-2009

2009-11-20 Thread Andrea Scarpino
> Duplicate PKGBUILDs > - > /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/arch-artwork vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/arch-artwork > /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/deb2targz vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/deb2targz > /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/javahelp2 vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/commun

Re: [arch-dev-public] Moving jackbeat to [community]?

2009-11-17 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 17/11/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > I think that you should move it to unsupported. Done -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] archweb work in progress

2009-11-16 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 17/11/2009, Dan McGee wrote: > As a side note, I now see Andrea wrote the patch, but Thomas committed it. Yes, I read maintainer was still Dusty, then I asked Thomas to fix FS#17161 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] Moving jackbeat to [community]?

2009-11-16 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, I am updating jackbeat, which is orphan, in [extra] and the last release (0.7.2) needs portaudio from [community]. Still, jackbeat provides pulseaudio support if it is built with; pulseaudio is in [community]. This package is orphan, so I think is not a good solution if I update it and add anot

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 11/11/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Can we have one more i686? signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Upstream bug closures

2009-11-09 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 09/11/2009, Jan de Groot wrote: > I see a lot of bugs getting closed with "Upstream" lately because > they're not packaging bugs. This is not the way to solve bugs. The only > bugs that should be closed upstream are the ones in binary modules like > flashplugin or nvidia binary drivers. Opensou

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving slimserver to AUR

2009-11-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/11/2009, Dan McGee wrote: > We have a thread going on this already from a few days ago where it > was being discussed: > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-October/014152.html Well, seems Paul is interested. sorry for double topic. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Li

[arch-dev-public] moving slimserver to AUR

2009-11-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
I want to remove slimserver from [extra]. It is orphaned and depends on perl-compress-zlib that is in AUR. Any objection? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] xorg moved, nvidia legacy driver issues

2009-11-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 31/10/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > Since xorg has moved to extra repository, > we will have broken nvidia legacy drivers: > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=139388&highlight=x.org > > We will see how fast new fixed legacy drivers will be released, if ever. > > As

[arch-dev-public] /srv/ftp/other permission

2009-10-31 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi DEVs, I won't to annoy Eric or Thomas anytime I need to put a tarball or I want to remove a dir from ftp/other. So, is possible to change /srv/ftp/other permission from ftp-arch to ftp-extra? Thanks -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssh 3.5p1-2

2009-10-29 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 29/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Changes: Create /var/empty in the init script if it doesn't exist > already - sshd will refuse to start otherwise. > > Please sign off both architectures. signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] network-plasmoid-svn on extra? (WAS: KDE, Bluetooth and Wifi)

2009-10-25 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 25/10/2009, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > I did not check it for some time. We are talking about > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/base/plasma/applets/networkmanager/ > right? > > If you think it's worth it you can move it to extra. > > But we should find a name which is more inline with upstr

Re: [arch-dev-public] should be esound an optdepends?

2009-10-20 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 21/10/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > Do you want to give us an explanation why this would be a good idea? You should ask this to Olivier Duclos. I don't know why this would be a good idea and I know nothing about esound. I only reported here this bug because there was a closure request from 6-7 day

[arch-dev-public] should be esound an optdepends?

2009-10-20 Thread Andrea Scarpino
>From FS#16502: With GNOME 2.28 arriving, it's time to make esound an optional package, which is currently not the case. Here is the list of the packages which requires esound. I think for all of them that esound should be an optional dependency (except maybe enlightenment?). * bmp * cinelerra-

Re: [arch-dev-public] network-plasmoid-svn on extra? (WAS: KDE, Bluetooth and Wifi)

2009-10-20 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 27/05/2009, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Its in a very early develepoment stage and its still in kde playground for a > reason; imho its not ready for production. After 5 months I think this plasmoid can be finally moved in [extra] o [community]. I am using it and it never crash, supports wireless w

Re: [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...

2009-10-17 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 17/10/2009, Eric Bélanger wrote: > Intead of removing the package, move it to /srv/package-cleanup. If > you make a mistake, it'll be easier to revert. ok next time I'll do. anyway I ever did it after ran /arch/db-extra -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...

2009-10-17 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 17/10/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for which > there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in their > filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with man pages > in /usr/man or uncompress man and i

Re: [arch-dev-public] Permission to adopt package in [community-testing]

2009-10-15 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 16/10/2009, Allan McRae wrote: > Wow... someone actually wants this! I did not expect that given > no-one adopts packages in [testing]. eh-eh, but I do!! -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] Permission to adopt package in [community-testing]

2009-10-15 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, please remember to add permission to adopt packages in [community-testing] to all TUs. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] abs - add community-testing to REPOS array

2009-10-15 Thread Andrea Scarpino
community-testing is fetched but is not in REPOS array -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer From 8d5b50789ff7324619c178a076e9b04f60422312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrea Scarpino Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:06:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] added community-testing to REPOS() --- conf

Re: [arch-dev-public] commits ML for community repo

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 13/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I vote for one list for all, the posts should be named such that one can > easily filter what is needed. +1. We should add [$repo] in subject -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] commits ML for community repo

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 13/10/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Eric Bélanger > wrote: > Would anyone have an issue with just adding those commits to the > existing ML? It's already very spammy, I don't think it could hurt > much Yes, I also think this is a good solution. Add they to arch-

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.4-1

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 13/10/2009, Andreas Radke wrote: > still alive. signoff x86_64. me too. signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-notifications] Core/Extra Cleanup 07-10-2009

2009-10-07 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/10/7 Eric Bélanger : > It's fixed now. Does anyone knows what happened? Only kdevelop and > kdevplatform were in /srv/package-cleanup. I had to grabbed the other > ones from a mirror (ftp://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/). Sorry is my fault. I putted manually in the repo the new kde packages and

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] popt 1.15-1

2009-10-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Upstream release released 12-Apr-2009. Please signoff both arch -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Check if ${SRC, PKG}DEST exist and are dirs before move files

2009-10-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/10/3 Andrea Scarpino : > code speak ops...this is for makechrootpkg -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Check if ${SRC, PKG}DEST exist and are dirs before move files

2009-10-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
code speak -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer 0001-check-if-SRC-PKGDEST-exist-before-move-files.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 02-10-2009

2009-10-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/10/2 : > /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/ruby-hpricot vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/ruby-hpricot > /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/memtest86+ vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/memtest86+ fixed > community/thunderbird-spell-i18n > community/thunderbird-spell-ru-ie > community/thunderbird-spell-ru-yo

Re: [arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...

2009-10-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/10/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Andrea, you have to add an appropriate pkgdesc for all of the > package_thunderbird-* functions. Yes I know...I only forgot they yesterday. Added groups=('thunderbird-i18n') to -4 too. I am uploading they. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...

2009-10-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my screen > today. Luckily I am not the only one distracted today :) Packages look good, users warned. Goodnight! -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...

2009-10-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest > file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your > original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code > was there in the first place, and then d

Re: [arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...

2009-10-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there. added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...

2009-10-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > It was partially broken before: ALL .xpi files have to be in > noextract=(...) for it to make sense. And they must be extracted all > separately, otherwise they will all have the same (wrong) .manifest file. Ok, fixed. What about "upgrade path"? Should I post

Re: [arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...

2009-10-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > See: > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html > > Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a > change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we > have split the big pack

[arch-dev-public] Inactive 24/09-30/09

2009-09-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi all, I will be inactive starting from now. I did 3 exams (wow!) and now I am going to Milan for a week and I will not have my laptop with me. Free to update my packages. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] some package needs rebuild for taglib-1.6?

2009-09-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 23/09/2009, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Was there a so name change? there is libtag.so.1.6.0 instead of libtag.so.1.5.0, but there are libtag.so{,.1} symlinks who point to libtag.so.1.6.0. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] some package needs rebuild for taglib-1.6?

2009-09-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi DEVs, I built the last version of taglib and taglib-extras, they are needed by amarok 2.2rc1. I can put they in [testing] instead of [extra], but I want to know if some package needs a rebuild. packages who depends on taglib are: ario bmp-musepack bmpx gimmix gstreamer0.10-good-plugins k3b kid3

Re: [arch-dev-public] pidgin maintainer wanted/where is pizzapunk?

2009-09-21 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/9/21 Andreas Radke : > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16215 > > nobody interested? it would be a glory to drop this pkg out of our > supported repos. > > I could just bump it once more and fix the pending dependency bug but I > don't want to do the splitting and maintenance for a longer time.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 18-09-2009

2009-09-18 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 19/09/2009, repoma...@archlinux.org wrote: > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/moiosms vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/moiosms > /srv/abs/rsync/any/community/xcursor-bluecurve vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/xcursor-bluecurve fixed -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] nfsidmap 0.23-1

2009-09-12 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 12/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > bump to latest version. > > Please signoff both arches. > greetings > tpowa nfsidmap: /usr/share/man/man5/idmapd.conf.5.gz exists in filesystem /usr/share/man/man5/idmapd.conf.5.gz is owned by nfs-utils 1.2.0-4 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux

Re: [arch-dev-public] Enable KMS by default for radeon and intel?

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 11/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > HI guys, > Shall i enable kms switch on per default on next .31 rebuild? > Radeon will not work without this switch. > Intel seems stable? > Jan or anyone else any input on this? I am using a i915 Intel and the only problem is that warning during boot. any

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.30.6-1

2009-09-10 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 10/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > No this is just a small version bump, if it boots all should be fine. Ok, so...sign-off i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.30.6-1

2009-09-10 Thread Andrea Scarpino
> Am Donnerstag 10 September 2009 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > anyone? All works here on an hp laptop with a pentium M. dmesg clean. There is some extra check I can do? On 10/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > I would like to add .31 kernel to testing, would you please signoff the last > .30 I w

Re: [arch-dev-public] Anyone else who has alsa issues?

2009-09-09 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 09/09/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > My system works fine, i use KDE with youtube and amarok playing music at the > same time. same here -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Away, wedding day...

2009-09-05 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 05/09/2009, Eduardo Romero wrote: > I know, this is not development related, but my wedding is in a few hours > and > I'm a bit anxious. Oh, and I forgot, I'll be away until Monday, so the Arch > Linux Magazine will be delayed a bit, but it will be worth the wait, this > time I > does really co

[arch-dev-public] BBS and group members

2009-09-05 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, I update Developers and Trusted Users groups on forum. I break from Developers: - dp (Damir Perisa) - ganja_guru (Varun Acharya) - Gyroplast (?) from Trusted Users: - angvp (Angel Velasquez) - bjorn (Bjørn Lindeijer) - DaNiMoTh - Neverth (Mikko Seppälä) - shastry (Vinay S Shastry) I update

[arch-dev-public] permission to adopt package in communtiy repo

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, I am still a TU so please give me permission on dev platform to adopt my packages in [community] repository. Thanks -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] subversion older in testing

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/09/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On 02/09/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> Would someone be able to bump the package in testing to match extra >> for this case? > I am building subversion 1.6.5-3 in [testing] but for i686 only. Ok, I putted subversion 1.6.5-2 built with ru

Re: [arch-dev-public] subversion older in testing

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 02/09/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Would someone be able to bump the package in testing to match extra > for this case? I am building subversion 1.6.5-3 in [testing] but for i686 only. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] Fwd: Extra package [kmplayer] marked out-of-date

2009-08-31 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi, can someone add this address to blacklist? Thanks -- Forwarded message -- From: Arch Website Notification Date: 2009/8/30 Subject: Extra package [kmplayer] marked out-of-date To: and...@archlinux.org * Note: this is an automated message buytramadolis...@gmail.com wants to

Re: [arch-dev-public] [aur-general] Inactive

2009-07-29 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 21/07/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > I need some days to re-organize my things first to become 100% active. Sorry, I found only now a connection to write you that I am still inactive (8-10 days yet). Everybody can update/fix my packages. Thanks you all. Regards -- Andrea `bash` Scarp

[arch-dev-public] Inactive

2009-07-09 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi all, I will be inactive starting from tonight to 26th July. At 9pm (GMT+1) I will start my inter-rail[1] with 2 friends; we will visit London, Amsterdam, Berlin and Prague. So this means I will not able to use my laptop and maybe I will not check my mails too. I hope to improve my English with t

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] + help needed readline rebuilds

2009-06-18 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 18/06/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote: > evms > fluidsynth > pal > socat > swi-prolog > uml_utilities built for i686 I tried to build wvstreams but it fails, also I tried the latest version who fails too. It is orphan. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] + help needed readline rebuilds

2009-06-18 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 18/06/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote: > gnokii built for i686, please build for x86_64 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in john/trunk (PKGBUILD)

2009-06-08 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 09/06/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 @ 19:48:09 > Author: andrea > Revision: 41997 > > upgpkg: john 1.7.0.2-5 > > Modified: > john/trunk/PKGBUILD > > --+ > PKGBUILD | 22 +++--- > 1 file ch

[arch-dev-public] [kde-unstable] re-enabled

2009-06-07 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi ML, only let you know the repository kde-unstable is again active. I packaged with Pierre KDE 4.3 beta2; at the moment packages are more big then previous because we enabled the DEBUG build option, but we will disable it soon: there are few vantages and many disadvantages to keep it. Pierre ta

Re: [arch-dev-public] network-plasmoid-svn on extra? (WAS: KDE, Bluetooth and Wifi)

2009-05-27 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 27/05/2009, Eduardo Romero wrote: > Well, if you are talking about networkmanager-plasmoid-svn which is a very > useful and cool application, I say yes. Yes, I am talking about networkmanager-plasmoid-svn. I do not more use it, I back to netcfg from 2 weeks, so feedback are appreciated. -- A

Re: [arch-dev-public] remove k3b-i18n from [extra]?

2009-05-27 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 27/05/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I use it for burning CDs regularly (getting rid of KDE3 stuff), but it > does have bugs - no critical bugs for me, but it has them (example: it > hangs for a while after burning when I try to quit). 1.66alpha2 is out and more bugs should be fixed now. -- An

[arch-dev-public] network-plasmoid-svn on extra? (WAS: KDE, Bluetooth and Wifi)

2009-05-27 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 27/05/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > How about adding this to extra? It seems NM is very popular, and until > it is part of kdenetwork we should not force a high percentage of our > users to build it from AUR. we could, I was waiting a stable version. what others DEV think about this? -- Andr

Re: [arch-dev-public] remove k3b-i18n from [extra]?

2009-05-25 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 26/05/2009, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > burning dvd data and audio cd work fine for me. > I don't have a real showstopper bug here in k3b. > You are right the k3b-i18n can be removed then until a ne version is > provided. Ok, if you think so...I removed it from [extra]. -- Andrea `BaSh` S

Re: [arch-dev-public] remove k3b-i18n from [extra]?

2009-05-25 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 25/05/2009, Eric Bélanger wrote: > I don't know how stable this package is as I burn CD/DVD very rarely > but there hasn't been any bug reports/complaints AFAIK. Go ahead and > move it back to testing if it > wasn't ready for extra. I could help. "This is a testing release not intended for pro

[arch-dev-public] remove k3b-i18n from [extra]?

2009-05-25 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi all, k3b-i18n in [extra] is incompatible with k3b-1.65, so it should be removed until a k3b1.65 compatible version will be released (if there will be). btw, I do not think is a good idea to keep an alpha version of k3b in [extra], IMHO we should downgrade the version in extra and move this one

Re: [arch-dev-public] Proper commit messages

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 24/05/2009, Jan de Groot wrote: > Could we please make sane commit messages in the near future, so we have > an idea why a package has been bumped? Yeah, this would be wonderful -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openswan 2.4.14-1

2009-05-16 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/5/11 Tobias Powalowski : > Hi > fixed manpath: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13764 > > and bump to latest 2.4.x version Hi, please take a look to this FR: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14195 -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] (partially) Inactive

2009-05-06 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi all, I will be inactive because I switched to a new ISP, so I will be without an internet connection for a $time (one or two weeks). I am an university student so I can use from 08AM to 07PM (GMT+1) the wireless connection at my university but it is over HTTP proxy: I will cannot use ssh/cvs/gi

Re: [arch-dev-public] Cannot login on flyspray

2009-05-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
works now On 03/05/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > I get this when I try to login: > > Error #23: User or group not enabled for login. > > What's up? > > -- > Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] Cannot login on flyspray

2009-05-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
I get this when I try to login: Error #23: User or group not enabled for login. What's up? -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

[arch-dev-public] autofs package - maintainer wanted

2009-05-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi ML, I'm having more problems with autofs package. I have no more a machine which uses it and disable/renable hal to test it everytime it needs is annoying and take my little freetime. So, I hope there is another DEV who like to adopt it. -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] Maintainer wanted for ruby

2009-05-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
Hi here, I received this mail from Elliott Cable. I don't know this man, so I forwarded the mail to arch-dev-public. -- Forwarded message -- From: elliott cable Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 04:11:10 -0800 Subject: Fwd: [arch-dev-public] Maintainer wanted for ruby To: and...@archlinux.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >