Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel framebuffer logo

2008-01-25 Thread Damir Perisa
hi Thayer, Friday 25 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote: | My method for making the kernel logo: |   1. Extract a png from the svg sources |   2. Resize and optimize the colour depth with GIMP/Fireworks |   3. Use pngtopnm (after patching our netpbm package) |   4. Use pnmtoplainpnm to

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.24-1

2008-01-25 Thread Damir Perisa
Friday 25 January 2008, Tobias Powalowski wrote: | Hi | kernel bump to .24 series for both arches in testing, please | signoff | | please also signoff the modules: | madwifi | ndiswrapper | rt2500 | wlan-ng26 | | integrated upstream into .24 series: | ipw3945 | iwlwifi | rt2x00-cvs

[arch-dev-public] colour Kernel framebuffer logo

2008-01-25 Thread Damir Perisa
Friday 25 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote: | On Jan 25, 2008 12:53 AM PST, Tobias Powalowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi | I am fine with any logo, please just provide me 3 files as i | need them. thanks | greetings | tpowa | | All three versions of the kernel logo are

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel framebuffer logo

2008-01-25 Thread Damir Perisa
Friday 25 January 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: | On Jan 24, 2008 8:10 PM, Thayer Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Thursday 24 January 2008, Damir Perisa wrote: | we ARE having the arch logo in the kernel replacing the linux | 2.0 pinguin (i made it). so i'm not getting the point

Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel framebuffer logo

2008-01-24 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 24 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote: | I've been testing various forms of the new logo for use in the | kernel framebuffer and I still think the best implementation is to | use no logo at all. The inherint disadvatange is that more and | more monitors are widescreen these days and

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving qt-4 and qt3 to [extra]

2008-01-18 Thread Damir Perisa
Friday 18 January 2008, Daniel Isenmann wrote: | if you move amarok and amarok-base, then you must move the | following: | | - libgpod | - gtkpod | - kipi-plugins | - rhythmbox and also - libmtp as well. - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ °

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 10 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote: | Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. | | I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. singing in the rain for x86_64 looks great, - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ °° °

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-03 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: | do not import it to [extra] untill it is one pkg that works, but | i'm sure you will not anyway, since you use it yourself? | | conditional +1 for this one: make it work for first. (i didn't | try it myself, dont have a dvd drive, maybe it

Re: [arch-dev-public] moving stuff into extra

2008-01-02 Thread Damir Perisa
Wednesday 02 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote: | Hi, | I'd like to bring the following packages into extra in the near | future and maintain them.. Please let me know if you have any | objections | | - smplayer / smplayer-themes - qt4 based frontend for mplayer | will move to testing