hi Thayer,
Friday 25 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote:
| My method for making the kernel logo:
| 1. Extract a png from the svg sources
| 2. Resize and optimize the colour depth with GIMP/Fireworks
| 3. Use pngtopnm (after patching our netpbm package)
| 4. Use pnmtoplainpnm to
Friday 25 January 2008, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
| Hi
| kernel bump to .24 series for both arches in testing, please
| signoff
|
| please also signoff the modules:
| madwifi
| ndiswrapper
| rt2500
| wlan-ng26
|
| integrated upstream into .24 series:
| ipw3945
| iwlwifi
| rt2x00-cvs
Friday 25 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote:
| On Jan 25, 2008 12:53 AM PST, Tobias Powalowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Hi
| I am fine with any logo, please just provide me 3 files as i
| need them. thanks
| greetings
| tpowa
|
| All three versions of the kernel logo are
Friday 25 January 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
| On Jan 24, 2008 8:10 PM, Thayer Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Thursday 24 January 2008, Damir Perisa wrote:
| we ARE having the arch logo in the kernel replacing the linux
| 2.0 pinguin (i made it). so i'm not getting the point
Thursday 24 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote:
| I've been testing various forms of the new logo for use in the
| kernel framebuffer and I still think the best implementation is to
| use no logo at all. The inherint disadvatange is that more and
| more monitors are widescreen these days and
Friday 18 January 2008, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
| if you move amarok and amarok-base, then you must move the
| following:
|
| - libgpod
| - gtkpod
| - kipi-plugins
| - rhythmbox
and also
- libmtp
as well.
- D
--
.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´
°
Thursday 10 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
| Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures.
|
| I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64.
singing in the rain for x86_64
looks great,
- D
--
.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´
°° °
Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote:
| do not import it to [extra] untill it is one pkg that works, but
| i'm sure you will not anyway, since you use it yourself?
|
| conditional +1 for this one: make it work for first. (i didn't
| try it myself, dont have a dvd drive, maybe it
Wednesday 02 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote:
| Hi,
| I'd like to bring the following packages into extra in the near
| future and maintain them.. Please let me know if you have any
| objections
|
| - smplayer / smplayer-themes - qt4 based frontend for mplayer
| will move to testing
9 matches
Mail list logo