Re: [arch-dev-public] Add active Python versions to the repos

On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:32:22 + Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 09:13 -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Why did you start the discussion if you plan on ignoring other people's > > opinions anyway? > > > > Doug >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add active Python versions to the repos

On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:05:04 + Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote: > As long as there is someone willing to maintain the packages, why would we > block > it? I doesn't really have any effect on the rest of the people. If the person > start having trouble maintaining them, they can be

Re: [arch-dev-public] Orphaned packages from arcanis

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 20:09:12 +0100 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > Yo! > > As a followup from the recent TU removal, I have composed a list of orphaned > packages from arcanis. Please write back if you adopt anything else I'll drop > packages into the AUR after some time has

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add active Python versions to the repos

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:59:21 + Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:58 +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public > wrote: > > Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 + > > schrieb Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public > > : > > > > > > > Does anyone have any big issue

Re: [arch-dev-public] News draft: Bug wrangling day

On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:31:23 +0200 Frederik Schwan via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hi people, > > given the large amount of open bugs, I'd like to invite all users to help out > with an official announcement. > > > > > > Kill Arch Bugs: Help us on the 13th of September! > > > We would

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

On Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:43 -0300 Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote: > Em maio 21, 2019 2:24 Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public escreveu: > > > > Without looking at dracut yet, I have a few questions: > > - Is there a description how to move from mkinitcpio to dracut? > > No, not

Re: [arch-dev-public] Proposal: minimal base system

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:09:32 +0900 Jiachen YANG via arch-dev-public wrote: > Currently the "base" group serves at least 2 purposes for us: ... > 2. A base chroot environment for devtools/makechrootpkg to prepare > packaging. ... > Currently, devtools/makechrootpkg will install "base" group for

Re: [arch-dev-public] Removing 'orphan' python2 modules

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:48:07 +0200 j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote: > Jelle van der Waa schreef op 2018-06-27 21:35: > > Hi All, > > > > Our repository contains a lot of python2 modules which are required by > > any package in the repository. I'd like to propose to remove these > > modules

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] / [extra] cleanup

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:12:18 +0800 Felix Yan via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 06/05/2018 04:01 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On 02/06/18 17:06, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > >> Looking at the packages in the BUILDINFO rebuild list, I've found some > >> packages which are so old that they might

Re: [arch-dev-public] Automating package conflict resolution whenever possible (xorgproto/libxfont dependency conflict)

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:52:16 +0100 (CET) Alad Wenter via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public hat am 14. > > Februar 2018 um 01:48 geschrieben: > > > > > > On 02/13/2018 06:56 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Automating package conflict resolution whenever possible (xorgproto/libxfont dependency conflict)

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:56:33 +0100 Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > Eli and I disagree about how dependency conflicts should be handled when > packaging. This was prompted by the libxfont dependency conflict arising > from recent xorgproto changes [1]. > > My

Re: [arch-dev-public] Windows Subsystem Linux - Arch Linux as official container?

On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:09:26 +0100 Thomas Bächler via arch-dev-public wrote: > Right now, I only have experience with the version before the fall > creators update, and that has issues: > > * As others mentioned, some glibc functionality relies on certain > clone()

Re: [arch-dev-public] Windows Subsystem Linux - Arch Linux as official container?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:14:55 +0100 Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:09:16PM -0600, Public mailing list for Arch Linux > development wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:00:28 +0100 > > Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public

Re: [arch-dev-public] Windows Subsystem Linux - Arch Linux as official container?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:00:28 +0100 Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hello everybody, > I would like to start a discussion about Windows Subsystem Linux and > Arch linux. You all might know that Microsoft has increased their > participation in open

Re: [arch-dev-public] [draft] The end of i686 support

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 21:25:49 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: > In all my time here, I can remember one i686 bug that did not also > affect x86_64. That suggests a common infrastructure is warranted. > > A I haven't been here nearly as long and remember far, far more than one.

[arch-dev-public] Away for a week

I'm leaving in the morning, should be back on the 16th. Internet will be mobile only and coverage is spotty, so I likely won't be around at all during the week. Doug (Scimmia) pgpdtDFP7fR0u.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] Bug tracker group - New TU

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:40:16 + Dan Printzell wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I got accepted as a TU about 6 days ago and I still haven't gotten upgraded > to the Trusted User group on the bug tracker. > > My account: https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/25875 > > Thanks > Dan Printzell

[arch-dev-public] Fwd: Away

I'm away from home this week. I knew Internet access would be slow, but it's totally unusable. I won't be back in touch until this weekend. Doug

[arch-dev-public] Taking a break

I'm sure some of you have noticed that I haven't been keeping up very well on the bug tracker. I've had a lot going on that hasn't really left enough time for Arch. I'm taking this opportunity to step back from Arch for a moment and take care of other things. I'll be back next week; until then,

Re: [arch-dev-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:43:18 + Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em janeiro 29, 2017 18:49 Pierre Schmitz escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to propose a migration to OpenSSL 1.1. The update comes with > > ABI and API changes. > > I don't know if it ever was

Re: [arch-dev-public] Shadowing i686, round 1

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 20:04:44 +0100 Balló György via arch-dev-public wrote: > Because I still use an i686-only system occasionally, and I prefer to > keep old hardware working with my favourite distribution. I agree that > building packages manually for a small

Re: [arch-dev-public] Shadowing i686, round 1

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:16:53 +0100 Balló György via arch-dev-public wrote: > -1 for dropping i686 completely. > > +1 for introducing automated builds, even if it's less secure. > > I would like to keep i686 supported, and willing to do anything that is > needed

Re: [arch-dev-public] Moving arduino into [community] important notes

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:28:02 +0100 Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2016-11-28 08:26, Antonio Rojas wrote: > > El Mon, 28 Nov 2016 01:34:38 +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski escribió: > > > >> There is no way to remove epoch, ever. I know it looks ugly for some > >>

Re: [arch-dev-public] Away Sept 9-17

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:32:43 -0500 Doug Newgard <scim...@archlinux.info> wrote: > I will be without regular internet access from the 9th through the 17th. I'm > trying to catch up with the bug ticket backlog before I go, but I can't make > any promises; I've been busy for a

Re: [arch-dev-public] Hooks rebuild #1

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:29:49 -0700 Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Balló György wrote: > > 2016-04-28 6:28 GMT+02:00 keenerd : > > > >> Namcap 3.2.7 is released. It removes the old .install

Re: [arch-dev-public] TU status upgrade on bug tracker

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:09:35 +1100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi, > > I've become a TU a little while ago, but I believe my status on the bug > tracker > has not been updated yet: > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/11798 > > Can somebody fix that? Thanks! > Looks like

Re: [arch-dev-public] PHP 7

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:05:56 +0100 Ike Devolder wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:59:46PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > On 19.12.2015 10:12, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > >We might be able to move these package to [extra] by end of this or > > >beginning of next year.

[arch-dev-public] Building in a clean chroot

I had two somewhat related bug reports recently. One of made it obvious that the packager wasn't building in a chroot. The second one was for a missing makedepends on a package that was added to the repo less than a day earlier. I figured this one might be from a dirty chroot, but after contacting