On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>
>> There was a message on arch-general, noting that kiwi does not depend on
>> gtk1.
>>
>> As I understand the situation, the holdups c
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> There was a message on arch-general, noting that kiwi does not depend on
> gtk1.
>
> As I understand the situation, the holdups concerning gtk1, kdelibs3
> and qt3 are now resolved, and there is a strong consensus that moving
> these pack
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Connor Behan wrote:
> On 05/04/14 11:57 AM, rods...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The only two packages I think might be worth extra concern here is:
> >
> > * imlib: needed by dfm, fvwm (should be possible to compile without
> > depending on imlib), kuickshow and tksystray
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2014-04-04 21:13 GMT+02:00 Eric Bélanger :
> >> * imlib: needed by dfm, fvwm (should be possible to compile without
> >> depending on imlib),
> >
> > Last time I check, it wasn'
tk1.
>
> So, can we move kdelibs3 and gtk from [extra] to either [community] or AUR?
>
>
> Here are the packages that depends on kdelibs3 (maintained by Eric
> Bélanger), together with the name of the current maintainer(s):
>
> kleansweep, Sergej Pupykin
> kovpn, Sergej Pupykin
&g
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Rødseth
> wrote:
> > One suggestion is creating the Apache 2.4 PKGBUILD first, then talk to
> > Jan de Groot.
> > If he should not be interested in the endeavor, talk to another dev.
>
> Go
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I'm looking for an [extra] maintainer for the following packages:
>
> lame
>
I've adopted lame. You can remove yourself from maintainer list.
> ddrescue
> schedtool
>
> And a [community] maintainer for these:
>
> lxsplit
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 29/09/13 17:36, Allan McRae wrote:
> > All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added
> > options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with
> > the idea of enabling it by default.
> >
> > My plan is:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Posting this one here as well (first posted to arch-general), as
> requested by Gaetan Bisson.
>
> In connection with the newly created TODO lists for rebuilds of
> packages formerly maintained by people that are no longer involved
> with
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Balló György wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like most of our artwork packages are orphan in the official
> repositories, and two of them are on the Midyear Cleanup list.
>
> Is it OK to drop them into unsupported? Or why don't we have an
> official Artwork Team who main
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After having read the recent git thread I've come to the conclusion that
> we should rework dbscripts before we start working on the package
> backend (although my proposal works better with git because it uses tags).
>
> TLDR: You s
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A todo list (https://www.archlinux.org/todo/replace-pil-with-pillow/)
> says to replace the python-imaging package by a python2-pillow
> package.
>
> This package doesn't seem to exist anywhere. What happened?
>
> Regards,
> Rémy
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this! What a plans with regard to
> [staging] in the near future? When it is free, I will kill the current
> TODO list and create a new one.
>
>
I just moved the openobex rebuild to the testing repo. The
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> We discussed removing static libraries for most packages back in March [1].
>
> Now makepkg for pacman-4.1 has an option "staticlibs" that automatically
> removes them. Should I make that the default in our makepkg.conf?
>
> Allan
>
>
>
No obj
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2013/5/22 Eric Bélanger :
> > Well gtk is a depends for imlib wich is required by fvwm, the WM I use.
>
> fvwm compiles without imlib and thus without gtk1
>
I got an email from a Gentoo dev (Sam
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 23/05/13 00:20, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens <
> > jan.steff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings everypony,
> >>
> >> Can w
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens <
jan.steff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings everypony,
>
> Can we throw out glib 1, gtk 1 and qt3? These are seriously legacy
> libraries.
>
> Check "pactree -rs glib" and "pactree -rs qt3" for dependent packages.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
Well g
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
> On 5 May 2013 01:31, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> > I'm in the process of fixing kdelibs3. I notice that optipng doesn't fix
> > all png files. Some are still broken after running optipng on them. I
> still
>
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
> On 04/05/13 10:38, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> > Tentatively, should we just run the fixer for the affected packages
> > and push them to testing (so visuals don't break all of a sudden after
> > updates)? Whether the maintainer says anythi
Hi,
Please note that the calligra package in [testing] has been build against
both the new poppler and the new openexr. Therefore, the poppler rebuild
should remain in [testing] until the openexr rebuild is done (the openexr
soname bump was missed so we are doing the rebuild in [testing] instead o
The qt3 package in the [testing] repo has some major changes. The most
important one is that it is now being installed in /usr instead of /opt/qt.
To use the qt3 binaries, you need to use the -qt3 suffix (e.g.: qmake-qt3,
moc-qt3, etc.) like it was done for the qt4 packages. The profile
/etc/profil
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
> Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
> makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
> good to go!
>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 13/02/13 19:06, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 13.02.2013 05:25, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>> FAIL: iw
>>>
>>> ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading iw-3.8.tar.bz2
>>
>> The URL is correct and the file downloads fine for me.
>>
>
> I still can not
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Those packages have conflicts on each other, sysvinit-compat is in base
> group,
> so shouldn't sysvinit moved to extra?
>
sysvinit is in a split PKGBUILD with sysvinit-tools which is a depends
for systemd-sysvcompat. As sysvi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> I renamed this thread to get it more visibility.
>
> Alexander did this list of orphans packages that can be moved to [community]:
>
We should only move packages to [community] if a TU is interested in
adopting them. Otherwise, we should
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 19/01/13 09:02, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Any dev want to take over the maintenance of tcl/tk in [extra]? My
>> interest in these packages is limited...
>>
>
> These are now orphans - feel free to adopt.
>
> Allan
>
>
I adopted both. Not reall
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 14.11.2012 19:22, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
>> FYI, the sourceball script for [community] isn't working anymore. From
>> the error message (below), it looks like a permission issue.
>>
>> mktemp: failed
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [community] has now moved to nymeria. That means you now have a
> 100Mbit/s uplink and lots of disk space (1TB disks, 200GB volume for now)
>
> Host name: nymeria.archlinux.org
> User name: same as archweb login name
>
> RSA fingerpri
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400
>> schrieb Dave Reisner :
>>
>>> An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do a rebuild for the
>>>
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> I discovered some new awesomeness in LVM2 (okay, not THAT new, but
> still, so far unknown to me).
>
> In our lvm2 package, I enabled lvmetad - this is a metadata caching
> daemon that reacts to events from udev. I completely reorganized our
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400
> schrieb Dave Reisner :
>
>> An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do a rebuild for the
>> applications which haven't been ported (as to not hold
>> libpurple/pidgin back).
>
> Sounds good to me
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> The rebuild list to add systemd units to packages was created on
> 2012-08-14 but there is still a number of packages in the repos without
> them. Given these packages are effectively unmaintained, I propose we
> remove them from the repos.
>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Here is the current list of what packages in [core] fail to build from
> SVN trunk:
>
> licenses - source checksum issues
>
>
> libusb-compat:
> core.c:91:2: warning: 'enum usbi_log_level' declared inside parameter
> list [enabled by default]
>
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and
> zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low
> maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash
> voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused by this post.
>
> I guess I should clarify my aim: As there are vocal proponents of
> sysvinit who feel strongly about staying with th
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As the move to systemd is under way, and we will soon have packages in
> our repos that require your system to be booted with systemd, I
> thought this would be a good time to summarize the state of
> sysvinit/initscripts in Arch
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to
> build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if
> you can fix issues in your packages.
>
>
> Testsuite failures:
>
> FAIL: openldap
> testsuite fa
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-09-06 17:39:03 +0200] Florian Pritz:
>> The idea is to reduce the possible damage an attacker can cause if he
>> happens to obtain a dev's/TU's ssh key. Without a shell and only a few
>> whitelisted commands the box should be very safe.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> My plan:
>>
>> 1) Tell people to migrate to systemd.
>> 2) Make new installations use systemd by default.
>> 3) Stop holding back packages because of systemd. For example: polkit
>>
Hi,
I'm orphaning sysklogd, an old logger pre-dating syslog-ng. With
systemd internal logger and syslog-ng for those who still wants text
file logs, I don't feel like adding service files to sysklogd. I'll
move it to AUR in a few days if no-one adopts it.
Eric
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Systemd has a overall better design than SysV, lots of useful administrative
> features and provide quicker boot up. Considering that it has been around in
> our repositories for some time and that it could be considered stable enough
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Thomas and Eric,
>
> Currently our lvm support in systemd does not allow lvm on top of
> encrypted devices [0]. This is easy to fix, and I added a second
> service file to svn which does this. I didn't change the PKGBUILD to
> ship it, so I
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> libimobiledevice-1.1.4 is in [staging]. Please make sure to move it with
> glew-1.8.0 as clementine depends on both.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stéphane
>
I've added libimobiledevice to the TODO list so that it won't be forgotten.
Eric
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> gcc-4.7 introduced some c++11 support, but unfortunately this resulted
> in a changed ABI for files compiled with c++98/03 support and those
> complied with c++11. So, if a library used c++11 but linked to a
> library using c++98,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> Date: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 00:08:20
>> Author: eric
>> Revision: 163220
>>
>> upgpkg: procps-ng 3.3.3-2
>>
>> Enable IPv6 priv
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Te
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
> not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
> these packages except to fix packaging errors.
> Please try them and complain on mailing
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 06/24/2012 11:37 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>> On 06/24/2012 11:10 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>>
>> I'd like to move 2.00 to [core] via [testing] when it is released,
>> lett
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> You're leaving the KISS principle here. This won't make things simpler
>> than they are right now for some years.
>>
>> Please keep our base and base-devel groups how they are. Skilled user
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 06:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just pushed in staging new updates for this two packages. We are doing
>> this two in the same time.
>>
>>
>
> bump.
>
> there are still 42 packages that haven't been recompiled in the list
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Le 2012-06-01 05:56, Allan McRae a écrit :
>>
>> FAIL: heirloom-mailx
>> make: /bin/install: Command not found
> Fixed in trunk.
You might want to run archrelease to get these fix picked up by ABS,
especially if they don't modify the
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a local rebuild of all [core] packages to test if there are
> any issues with the upcoming glibc-2.16 before it gets released. As a
> baseline, I built the [core] repo using the current glibc. All failures
> are from the lat
Hi,
In the new 3.3.3 upstream update of procps-ng, the skill and snice
utilities are no longer built by default. According to the man page:
"These tools are obsolete and unportable. The command syntax is
poorly defined. Consider using the killall, pkill, and pgrep commands
instead."
I would lik
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.05.2012 03:28, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> Do we care about makedepends being in repos lower down the hierarchy?
>>
>> The current Integrity Check email lists >170 issues in this category.
>> If these are never going to be addressed, I sug
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Eric Bélanger
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Here is a news draft for the move of the php packages to [extra] which
> should happen later this week. Let me know if I miss anything or how I
> could improve this news item.
>
> ---
> PHP has been updated to its latest major release 5.4. Th
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Eric Bélanger
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Eric Bélanger
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a tentative sysctl.conf : https://dev.archlinux.org/~eric/sysctl.conf
>> that I obtained with the help of Jan and Dave on IRC. The unusefu
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:49:56PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 28,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:49:56PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >> On Apr 24, 2012 1
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
>
>
> = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community =
>
>
> Performing integrity checks...
> ==> parsing pkgbuilds
> ==> parsing db files
> ==> checking misma
Hi,
The procps project didn't had any new release for a while and the
current package use a dozen of patches to fix miscellenaous things.
I'm thinking about switching to procps-ng[1]. Procps-ng is a fork of
procps by Debian, Fedora and openSUSE. Gentoo is also using procps-ng
(although, like Debi
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:04:25 +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19.04.2012 10:56, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:04:25 +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>
>> On 19.04.2012 10:56, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 19, 2012 10:37 AM, "Thomas Bächler" wrote:
>>>>
>>
Hi,
Currently, the inetutils packages provide the old unsecure r* family
of tools. There is currently a bug report [1] asking for the removal
of rexec as it it particularly unsecure. As these things are old and I
suppose everyone has moved to more secure apps like ssh/sftp, I'm
thinking about remo
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While trying to update mpg123, I noticed that namcap reported that the
> library in the i686 package had text relocations. After reporting that
> to upstream [1], it turns out to be a known issue with the assembly
Hi,
While trying to update mpg123, I noticed that namcap reported that the
library in the i686 package had text relocations. After reporting that
to upstream [1], it turns out to be a known issue with the assembly
optimisation. The only way to remove the text relocations (apart from
not supplying
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-03-17 17:37:44 +0100] Thomas Bächler:
>> Am 17.03.2012 09:07, schrieb Arch Website Notification:
>> > == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) ==
>> > * lvm2-2.02.95-1 (i686)
>> > 1/2 signoffs
>>
>> We never get 2 i686 signoffs h
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have put openssl 1.0.1 into [testing]. This version is still ABI
> compatible with previous versions and as such there was no soname bump.
> However, some application have some broken runtime checks and will
> refuse to work. I
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>> On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> i cannot spe
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i cannot speak about libtiff but libpng 1.5 rebuild is going to be
>>> difficult. All previous warnings are now fatal and a lot of patching is
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012 7:27 AM, "Ray Rashif" wrote:
>>
>> On 3 January 2012 19:48, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> > On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> >> hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
>> >> function, and I'm n
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 04/01/12 05:02, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>> Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
> yet signed?
>
> There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
> around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate
> we will hav
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> I also did other minor change to the package:
>> - Update license, Add file depends, Add missing hook scripts, Add
>> python2 and ruby optdepends for the hook scrip
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 09:27 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just pushed an upstream update (1.7.2) for subversion in the [testing]
>> repo.
>>
>> There should be no compatibility problems when updating
Hi,
I just pushed an upstream update (1.7.2) for subversion in the [testing] repo.
There should be no compatibility problems when updating from 1.6.X.
The only minor issue is that existing working copies created with
Subversion 1.6 and earlier need to be upgraded before they can be used
with a Su
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 11:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
>
>> == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (22 total) ==
>>
>> * kernel26-lts-2.6.32.49-1 (i686)
>
> nvidia-lts 290.10-1 is broken with this version.
>
>
> [ 17.784223] nvidia: d
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143
> 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887.
>
> Every packager please do:
>
> 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username
> and sign your reply u
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>> Devs,
>>>>
>>>>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Devs,
>>
>> This seems like a good time to get the ball fully rolling on the
>> package signoffs page: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
>
> Devs (and TUs, someone link this to them
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> just orphaned these 3 programs because I don't use them since ages anymore.
>
I adopted k3b.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Devs,
>
> This seems like a good time to get the ball fully rolling on the
> package signoffs page: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
>
> I and a few others would like to make this the goto for signoffs-
> fewer emails, easier to see a
Rebuild to add signature, Clean up depends and makedepends
Rebuild to add signature. Please signoff.
Rebuild to add signature. Please signoff.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Am 31.10.2011 09:52, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 31/10/11 18:35, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>>> [2011-10-31 08:26:26 +0100] Tobias Powalowski:
Which login manager is the best then?
>>>
>>> In my opinion: none. I use startx.
>>>
>>> If you n
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it's about time to finalize our signing policy to get all our packages
> properly signed as soon as possible. Note that this is just about
> signing the package itself. How we will manage our keyring and sign that
> one using mas
Hi,
libevent 2.0.15-1is in testing for an upstream update. Please test and signoff.
Eric
Changes in version 2.0.15-stable (12 Oct 2011)
BUGFIXES (DNS):
o DNS: add ttl for negative answers using RFC 2308 idea. (f72e8f6
Leonid Evdokimov)
o Add DNS_ERR_NODATA error code to handle empty replies. (
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bridge-utils 1.5-1 is in testing.
>
> Changes:
> - Upstream update
> - Update url
> - Change license: GPL2 to GPL
>
> I don't really use this but the few tests in the source tarball seemed
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bridge-utils 1.5-1 is in testing.
>
> Changes:
> - Upstream update
> - Update url
> - Change license: GPL2 to GPL
>
> I don't really use this but the few tests in the source tarball seemed
Hi,
bridge-utils 1.5-1 is in testing.
Changes:
- Upstream update
- Update url
- Change license: GPL2 to GPL
I don't really use this but the few tests in the source tarball seemed
to work. Please test and signoff.
Eric
Hi,
inetutils-1.8-6 is in testing.
Changes:
- Update license to GPL3
- Set sysconfdir to /etc (close FS#26393)
Please test and signoff.
Eric
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Eric Bélanger
>>> wrote:
>>>> It&#x
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> It's been a while but are we doing the hostname provider idea?
>
> I don't have a strong opinion, but the provider makes sense to me.
> Especi
Hi,
logrotate 3.8.1-1 is in testing for an upstream update. Please test and signoff.
3.8.0 -> 3.8.1
- fixed 1 memory leak in prerotateSingleLog
- another fixes for Solaris
- fixed HP-UX compilation and default config
- do not redirec
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:18:02PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:29:06PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A lot of people think ftp.archlinux.org is some special server and when
> kernel.org was breached, I saw claims like "the packages are the same as
> on ftp.archlinux.org", which made me worry that some users might trust
> this server
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/09/11 06:22, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:20:49 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> This splits the libtool package into libltdl and libtool. Most
>>> packages that depended on libtool probably only need to depend on
1 - 100 of 1030 matches
Mail list logo
