On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have set up a repo with an ncurses version that only has wide-charater
>> libraries and rebuilt as many packages as I knew needed a r
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:44:11AM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:44:22 -0500
> schrieb "Dan McGee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined
> > here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=NEWS
> >
> > Ca
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:00:00PM +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:49:51PM -0300, Hugo Doria wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I created a wiki page for this:
> > http://wiki.archlinux
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:49:51PM -0300, Hugo Doria wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created a wiki page for this:
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Repo_CleanUp
>
> I think its a start and we can put all packages that should be
> removed
On 7/22/08, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the new kernel in testing, it's time to start gearing up for a
> release that will likely include the .1 or .2 kernel from this series.
> Were there any big issues besides base package selection that anyone
> noticed, or anything you wanted i
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:44:51PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> It is quite important actually. klibc has no dynamic linker, so the
> library name of klibc is hardcoded in the ELF binaries. I make the klibc
> version string known to pacman, so nobody installs klibc packages
> incompatible
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 08:52:11PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Rebuild against 2.6.26 headers, update of v86d as the old version
> segfaultet in 2.6.26.
> Also, pacman now ensures that the klibc version is compatible.
>
> This is only tested on x86_64, so I need 2 signoffs for i686.
>
pacman
Update
Damir's packages are
vips-devel already newer version is in extra.
nip2-devel as above
abcm2ps-devel last updated Version 5.5.2 - 07/08/18
Doubt Damir has time to maintain any of those.
Reiserfs4 :
libaal
reiser4progs
are iphitu's
Iphitus hasnt replied yet. Is any
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:44:52PM -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
> Anyone working on the bind/dnsutils update to fix the recent DNS
> security vulnerabilities?
>
> I will take a crack at that tonight and put it in testing, unless Kevin
> or someone else is already on it.
AFAIK Kevin built it and it
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:34:09PM +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:08:32PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2008 21:09:51 schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> &
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> new kernel is in testing for both arches. no further changes
> expect the version bump. please signoff quickly.
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
>
> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.25.11
> kernel.
>
> It contains
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:08:32PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2008 21:09:51 schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > > I uploaded a new filesystem package to testing:
> > >
> > &
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> I uploaded a new filesystem package to testing:
>
> * added http user and group (for use by various webserver related packages)
> * an updated apache is on its way
> * added scanner group (ask Thomas ;-))
> * use /srv instead
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:08:52PM -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
>
> Yes, keep my fvwm-devel package. You can move it to extra. I also use
> gqview-devel so move it extra as well. I'll take it if Damir no longer
> wants it.
>
> Damir has several packages in unstable. I don't know if he still want
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:59:25PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> $ find /home/ftp/unstable -name '*.pkg.tar.gz' | wc -l
> 35
>
> Should I move all these to package-cleanup and remove them from the
> DB? or does anyone want to move anything to extra?
>
> I can do all this cleanup, if someone wi
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:07:27PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> works fine here on both arches. give you signoffs for both arches.
>
Am i missing something? Glib2 is still in 2.16-3 for x86_64.
There is also a bug report for it
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10824 that should be closed when upda
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:25:15AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
>>> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL P
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Summary
>>> -
>>> Dirs with missing PKGBUILDs: 0
>>> Duplicate PKG
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Summary
> -
> Dirs with missing PKGBUILDs: 0
> Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0
> Missing (make)dependencies:8
> Unmet provisioned (make)dependencies: 4
> Circular dependencies:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:21:46PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> i'm just preparing the db and heimdal .so bumps. please don't update
> related packages anymore.
>
> i hope to finish base rebuilds within one or two more days for x86_64.
> then i'll update the testing repo db and will cry for help
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:31:35AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Belanger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)
> >>>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:37:01AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>
> Additionally, it seems silly to change this
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
> The following rebuilds against x264 are needed for the soname bump for
> new x264 snapshot in testing. I've already done mplayer and ffmpeg.
>
> ./extra/avidemux (depends)
> ./extra/vlc (depends)
> ./extra/gstreamer0.10-bad-plugins (d
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:38:41PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I commited a new apache to [testing]. I have removed the custom configs and
> index.html. Instead I just provide the upstream defaults. /home/httpd was
> removed, too. Instead error pages and images for dirlistings etc. ar
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
>
> too late. man-pages 3.00 is out. posix man-pages have been split out of
> the source. we keep them together in one pkg. the 3.00-1 pkg is in
> testing for both arches. please signoff.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/change
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> > Sorry, this got lost in the dust. 2008.06-2 adds a symlink, please
> > signoff. Eric, if you could rebuild for x86_64, that would be great.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
>
> rebuild done for x86_64. no problems so far. i signoff for x86_64.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 06:43:13AM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> Speaking of things developers do, has anyone written up a brief thing
> on signoffs? Like what signing off actually entails, how many are
> needed for core packages, whether you can do it for extra, etc. If
> anyone still has those old
Hi, i seem to be having trouble finding elliot under the assignees list
in flyspray. Anyone have any idea whats going on?
I guess he is still part of the crew and its a weird flyspray bug of
some sort.
Greg
Is cdtool part of the list? AFAI can see there is no maintainer listed.
Theres a bug report about it http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10558 but
it seems dead and needed only by tcdr which also looks like a dead
project.
2 possible candidates for removal?
If not, then someone adopt cdtool so i can ass
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 06:26:33PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I saw this bug today: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10526
>
> I do not use samba, but could update it and pray if no one else
> actually uses it.
If this is going to stay in testing before it hits extra as suggested,
it should be u
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31:33PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> This reminds me a feature request about providing more root
> certificates in a separate package (more than in previous openssl
> package).
You mean http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7912 ?
Discussion seems to focus on creating a seper
31 matches
Mail list logo
