On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
> I also had a plus of around 180 MiB (including lib32-mesa) on a standard
> desktop running X11, 3D, games and the like, so this does not only
> concern non-X11 systems.
The mesa package seems to contain at least 7 (!) copies of LLVM, in
egl_
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> Can't you build them with shared llvm libs?
Nope, we don't have any.
Building LLVM with cmake instead of autotools creates them, but that
approach has other problems.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what would be the benefit of keeping it split up
> rather than just merging (almost) everything?
The drivers are damn large (thanks to LLVM). No need to have them
installed if you ain't got the hardware.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> Perhaps we could merge:
> - mesa, khrplatform-devel
> - libglapi, libgl, libgles
> - libgbm, libegl
Also, the pipe drivers from libgbm should be sorted into the *-dri packages.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> You can always have each Java runtime provide a different file, and
> include all of them in each Java service file using
>
> EnvironmentFile=-/path/to/java/runtime/number/one
> EnvironmentFile=-/path/to/java/runtime/number/two
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 12/01/13 08:16, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>> At least three bugs on our bug tracker can be solved by making relevant
>> truetype font packages provide 'ttf-font':
>>
>> FS#33367: [chromium] should not depends on ttf-dejavu [1]
>> FS#26012: [
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> Better as optdepend of mesa package, because swrast driver can use it too
libgl then, not mesa.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> "S2TC is a patent-free S3TC compatible implementation and provides
> texture compression to Mesa. The package also includes tools to
> compress/decompress S2TC textures and convert S3TC textures to
> S2TC ones using the patent-free algo
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.6.10 series for both arches.
> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>
> This will move to [core] directly, because 3.7 is in [testing].
>
> greetings
> t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> It should not. However, you can disable any global configuration by
> this:
>
> echo setopt no_global_rcs >> ~/.zshenv
>
> Would that be OK?
Not quite. You also need to add "source /etc/zsh/zprofile" to restore
sourcing of /etc/profile.
Could we please remove grml-zsh-config from nymeria? It conflicts with
my own config.
Let users who want that set it up themselves.
tarts dhclient with a bad path to lease file
To: Jan Steffens
Hi,
some time ago this was reported as bug and I changed dhclient to
use /var/state/ directory. Personally I don't care where the file is
located. Feel free to change it in the dhclient package. At the moment I
have no time because
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
> This is nice while your configured internet connection works :)
>
> At least under my scenario (behind a router), DNS setup to my ISP, If
> internet connection goes down, all programs that tries to resolve local
> hostname will "slee
Greetings fellow Archers,
GNOME 3.6 finally hits [testing].
As many packages as possible have been moved from GStreamer 0.10 to
GStreamer 1.0. Remember to install the plugins if you have trouble
playing media.
They are: gst-plugins-base gst-plugins-good gst-plugins-bad
gst-plugins-ugly gst-libav
There's a pretty ugly IPv4 forwarding regression in Linux 3.6 which
hits my router, preventing masquerading from working properly. Patch
is queued for 3.6.2.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=blob;f=queue-3.6/ipv4-add-a-fib_type-to-fib_info.patch;h=7bbb0cda1d51863
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:50 PM, keenerd wrote:
> The whole nspawn thing puts a bit of a crimp in those of us who us
> build helpers. But there are exciting workarounds!
>
> I was going to post a clever one liner that gets around nspawn, but I
> am not clever enough to get it on one line. I neede
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> With systemd-193 and linux-3.6 we will finally have reliable support
> for btrfs multi-device filesystems (assembling them used to be racy).
>
> However, the added udev rules that makes this work do not work at all
> on pre-3.6 ke
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> Do we really need remote signing for the DB, given that each of us
> already downloads the DB when upgrading, most likely several times a
> day? I do not think downloading it a couple more times when pushing
> packages will change much. Then
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky
> wrote:
>> I'm not using systemd and I don't want to switch to systemd on my
>> development machine any time soon.
>
> Are there any specific problems that is holding you back from using
> s
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 30.08.2012 12:32, schrieb Jan Steffens:
>>> You use Type=forking with a process that doesn't fork - that's what
>>> 'nodetach' means: do NOT fork into the background. That doesn't seem r
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 30.08.2012 02:50, schrieb Jan Steffens:
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> While creating systemd units for my packages, I found two problems:
>>>
>>> 1) I cannot force pppd
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 30.08.2012 02:50, schrieb Jan Steffens:
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> While creating systemd units for my packages, I found two problems:
>>>
>>> 1) I cannot force pppd
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> While creating systemd units for my packages, I found two problems:
>
> 1) I cannot force pppd fork to the background. While it is the default
> behaviour, the user can override that with the 'nodetach' and 'updetach'
> configuration options
Can we drop xulrunner to the AUR? Or does a TU want to maintain it in
[community]?
freewrl has multiple options on which spidermonkey implementation to
use, so it probably should depend the "js" package instead.
I believe the packages building browser plugins can use the Firefox
development files
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As was discussed some time ago, I'd like to drop cpufrequtils from our
> repos. It is dead upstream, and has been replaced by cpupower (in
> community).
>
> I see no reason to move cpupower out of community, but let me know if
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:39:34PM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> On Tuesday 14 August 2012 18:34:13 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> > There are still a lot of unit files missing; we should create a todo
>> > list. It would also be helpful to write
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Systemd has a overall better design than SysV, lots of useful administrative
> features and provide quicker boot up. Considering that it has been around in
> our repositories for some time and that it could be considered stable enough
>
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> As it's been marked out-of-date for a while, and I'm interested in it,
> I've done the work to upgrade the polkit package to 0.107. I've tested
> this package locally. The main value of this upgrade (for me at least)
> is systemd integration, inc
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel series?
>
> greetings
> tpowa
>
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
3.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it took a little bit longer, but here is the date for our first Google+
> Hangout. Some devs know what I mean, for all the others a short
> explanation.
>
> I had a discussion with some devs on Google+
> (https://plus.google.com/u/0
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> Final Xorg-server has been released. No major issues have been reported
>> to our tracker. Touchpad issues seem all solved, right?
>>
>> I'm going to move
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Final Xorg-server has been released. No major issues have been reported
> to our tracker. Touchpad issues seem all solved, right?
>
> I'm going to move this soon to extra if you don't raise any stopper.
>
> -Andy
I'm still getting bursts of r
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Why on earth do the linker, kernel modules, etc. need to
> be in /usr/lib/ at all, other than Poettering's raves and rants?
We need to empty /lib, otherwise we can't symlink it.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> Seems like we need to build netcf with libnl3, since libvirt links to
> both libnetcf and libpcap (already built against libnl3).
>
> Also see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651033 .
>
> Too bad Ubuntu
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl
> 3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos,
> 0.1.9 upstream).
>
> Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't app
Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl
3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos,
0.1.9 upstream).
Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't apply to the
upstream 0.1.9 sources.
I'd rather have this handled properly instead of just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143
> 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887.
>
> Every packager please do:
>
> 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Changes:
> - fairly minor upstream update
> - removed patches included upstream
> - gone back to old workaround for crappy DNS servers as both proposed fixed
> upstream do not fully work.
> - enabled multi-arch support (single DSO with optimiz
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Minor upstream update.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> Hi,
> new version, please signoff
> Changes:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2011-September/014707.html
>
>
> --
> Ionuț
>
Signoff x86_64.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the release of mkinitcpio 0.7.3. This is largely
> a maintenance release with a number of bugfixes and cleanups. I've
> highlighted the new features and some of the bug fixes below, followed by
> the full sho
I've been wondering why we do not have /usr/libexec.
The GNOME packages apparently use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/$pkgname.
We've been running into problems with GNOME 3.2 because increasingly
more components depend on the libexecdir being the same across all
packages (we already had this problem in GD
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> To make a long story short; in stead of fixing the "storage" group, I
> intend to remove support for it from udev, and direct people to use
> udisks instead.
Or, if they don't want udisks, then su root. Given how much damage you
can do with
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 23/08/11 10:14, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:15:02PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the only package in [core] that has a build failure due to
>>> the recently changed CFLAGS. Fixed it...
>>>
>>> Signoff
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> We've just moved the gnutls 3.0.0 rebuilds to testing. Please check if
> anything is broken and report bugs or give us your ok to move them all
> to extra/community.
>
> -Andy
>
(Reposting on dev-public because I didn't notice the recipient
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Upstream update, please sign off.
>
>
Signoff x86_64, doesn't seem to be broken.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Upstream update, also enable md5sum, sha1sum, sha256sum and sha512sum.
>
> Please sign off.
>
>
Signoff x86_64. Recreated image still boots.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> I'd like to pick up something Dan proposed about a year ago, which is
> dropping support for tcp_wrappers. Its last official upstream release
> was 1997, and we currently add 10 patches to it from 3 different distros
> in order to make it com
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
> contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
> little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of
> initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sudo 1.8.1p2 is in testing for an upstream update.
>
>
>
>
> Major changes between version 1.8.1p2 and 1.8.1p1:
>
> Two-character CIDR-style IPv4 netmasks are now matched correctly
> in the sudoers file.
>
> A build error with
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a minor update for xz. Please sign off.
>
> Changelog:
>
> 5.0.3 (2011-05-21)
>
> * liblzma fixes:
>
> - A memory leak was fixed.
>
> - lzma_stream_buffer_encode() no longer creates an empty .xz
>
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please signoff
>
> Changes:
> * Bugs fixed:
> 635694 gdbus aborting due to unauthorized socket...
> 637561 Crash when using G_DBUS_SERVER_FLAGS_RUN_IN_THREAD
> 642935 g_date_time_format() prints wrong value for %z...
> 643134 g_dbu
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi
> minor patch added which fixed mount -a segfault.
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
Signoff both.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> I have fixed:
>
> FS#22481 - [rp-pppoe] remove from base group
> FS#20925 - [rp-pppoe] pppoe-server has wrong hardcoded path to pppoe-plugin
>
> Please signoff i686 and x86_64. I can't test it, because I don't use it.
>
> Daniel
>
Signoff
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> New snapshot from the 2.21 branch which includes some backported fixed for
> LTO.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Seems to work well, signoff both.
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> New upstream snapshot from the 4.6 branch. Contains quite a few backported
> fixes of some interest. No new testsuite issues.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Seems to work well, signoff both.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24043
>
> Hi shall we enable it too?
> Thanks for your opinion.
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.or
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> here is one. signoff i686
Signoff both.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> New mesa requires llvm to build and run gallium based drivers. So we
> need to move llvm to extra (current TU maintainer Evangelos Foutras).
>
> Who's going to maintain it in extra? I don't have any interest in it. I
> will have to wait until
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream update.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> The gcc-4.6 toolchain looks good to me so it is time for signoffs. This
> covers the following packages:
>
> binutils 2.21-6
> cloog 0.16.2-1
> gcc 4.6.0-3 (and the various split packages)
> glibc 2.13-5
> isl 0.06-1
> linux-api-headers 2.6.38
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Nothing broken. Signoff x86_64
>
> Stéphane
>
Ditto. Sign off both.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Where can I put a chroot (temporarily) to ensure it will not be deleted
> unless I manually do it? I had a bunch of gcc test suite log files from my
> last build sitting in my chroots for use in tracking down failures and these
> have now bee
Our PKGBUILD.com build server is now tentatively running my devtools patchset.
User-visible changes should be:
--- *-build now always requires sudo. This used to be inconsistent,
requiring sudo only for -c.
--- All chroots are now kept in /var/tmp/archbuild, a btrfs volume.
--- All chroot copies a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> It looks all very good to my non-expert eye, except that I wouldn't
> silently fall back on use_rsync=true when btrfs returns an error (line
> 134 of makechrootpkg): there are probably some failure cases where we
> want to see the error messa
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> I started patching devtools: https://github.com/heftig/devtools/commits/master
>
> Main new features are:
> - support for using Btrfs snapshots instead of rsync
> - sharing the chrootdir with other users, with lockin
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> I started patching devtools:
>> https://github.com/heftig/devtools/commits/master
>>
>> Main new features are:
>> - support for using Btrfs snapshots
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 14/03/11 21:20, Jan Steffens wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Jan Steffens
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This revision adds a patch that sends a signal over DBus when the list
>>>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> This revision adds a patch that sends a signal over DBus when the list
> of known BSSs changes.
> This is required by NetworkManager 0.8.995, but shouldn't break anything else.
>
> Please sign off both.
>
One more for i686?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Another upstream patch... do no ask for passwords with "sudo -n" if the
> user is not in the sudoers file.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Another day, another bash patch level bump...
>
> Bug-Description:
> When used in contexts where word splitting and quote removal were not
> performed, such as case statement word expansion, empty strings
> (either literal or resulting from quot
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Fairly minor upstream bugfix release:
>
> * Noteworthy changes in release 1.4.16 (2011-03-01) [stable]
>
> ** Fix regressions in the `index' builtin. On glibc platforms, this
> avoids false positives from a strstr bug in glibc 2.9 through 2.1
I started patching devtools: https://github.com/heftig/devtools/commits/master
Main new features are:
- support for using Btrfs snapshots instead of rsync
- sharing the chrootdir with other users, with locking
Both were developed to improve disk usage and performance on our
buildserver PKGBUILD
This revision adds a patch that sends a signal over DBus when the list
of known BSSs changes.
This is required by NetworkManager 0.8.995, but shouldn't break anything else.
Please sign off both.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> I just noticed some weird stuff happening to the output of sudo -l,
> differing the first and second (using cached credentials) times it's
> used:
This happens with both sudo 1.8.0-2 and sudo 1.8.0-3. -3 does fix the
-v retu
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Another upstream patch to fix the "sudo -v" return value.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
>
I just noticed some weird stuff happening to the output of sudo -l,
differing the first and second (using cached credentials) times it's
used:
---
~/ sudo
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream patch level bump. Includes the fix for that timezone issue...
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream bug fix release. All test suite passes.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Lets try this update again... without the patch that causes bash to break!
> My system now reboots nicely.
>
> Note that I did not use force on the bash-4.2.004-1 package, as users should
> have seen the message to downgrade from bash-4.2.00
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> implemented FS#21391.
>
> is needed because > consolekit 0.4.2 changed the default policy and expects
> that a third party to authorize the user. That works out of the box with
> graphically login managers as GDM/KDM/LXDM.
>
> Note that
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Fix issues with prelink (FS#22656)
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Major upstream update.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Major upstream update. Please test well.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Seems to work well.
Signoff both.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys.
> upstream release:
> udev 166
>
> Bugfixes.
>
> please signoff both arches,
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.or
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm going to signoff both libevent and nfs-utils in the same thread.
>
> libevent 2.0.10
> * upstream release
> * a changelog a bit to long to be included here.
>
> nfs-utils 1.2.2-5
> * contain a fix for #22358
> * libevent 2.0 rebuild
>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a security update of openssl; please sign off.
>
> Changes between 1.0.0c and 1.0.0d [8 Feb 2011]
>
> *) Fix parsing of OCSP stapling ClientHello extension. CVE-2011-0014
> [Neel Mehta, Adam Langley, Bodo Moeller (Google
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream update.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
>
> NEWS
>
> * Noteworthy changes in release 8.10 (2011-02-04) [stable]
>
> ** Bug fixes
>
> du would abort with a failed assertion when two conditions are met:
> part of the hierarchy being traver
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Bump signoff both arches, this rests since ages now in testing.
> greetings
> tpowa
>
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
Kernels built successful
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Cleaned up PKGBUILD and fixed some issues with blkid. References:
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22666
> http://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=129673543611821&w=2
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux-ng/util-linux-ng.git;a=commitdif
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Fix a threading issue on x86_64:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12403
>
> i686 rebuild just to keep package versions the same.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
>
Signoff both.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Guillaume ALAUX
wrote:
> Gaëtan (vesath) and I took care of some Arch bugs.
>
> PKGBUILD cleaned
>
> Arch Bug fixes:
> - FS#20191 - upstream config files modified on install
> sshd_config and ssh_config are not modified anymore
>
> - FS#19213 - sshd ignores
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 13.01.2011 19:24, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned.
>>
>> These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0:
>> - crda
>> - iw
>> - wpa_supplicant
>> - hostapd
>
> These seem to be okay
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> * Tidy up PKGBUILD
> * Rebuild of old package
>
> Please signoff both.
> Thanks
>
> Stéphane
>
Signoff both.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> * Rebuild of old package
> * Tidy up PKGBUILD
>
> Please signoff both.
> Thanks
>
> Stéphane
>
Signoff both.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> * Rebuild of old package
> * Tidy up PKGBUILD
>
> Please signoff both.
> Thanks
>
> Stéphane
>
Signoff both.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> * Rebuild of old package
> * Tidy up PKGBUILD
>
> Please signoff both.
> Thanks
>
> Stéphane
>
Signoff both.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> * Rebuild of old package
> * Tidy up PKGBUILD
> * Simplify build logic
> * Fix permissions on /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0
>
> Please signoff both.
> Thanks
>
> Stéphane
>
Signoff both.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream bug fix/security release.
>
> Signoff both,
> Allan
Signoff both.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>
> PS: the package should install /sbin/request-key. The package on the
> AUR sets it to /usr/sbin however. This needs correction.
>
> If this works, we need to decide if we want to support the new ID
> mapper (and bring k
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>
> Try installing keyutils from the AUR.
>
PS: the package should install /sbin/request-key. The package on the
AUR sets it to /usr/sbin however. This needs correction.
If this works, we need to decide if we want to support the new
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
