Re: [arch-dev-public] Correct hostname configuration

2010-09-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:17:38 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Hi all, we just figured out that the new dbscript don't work on sigurd because the use hostname -s to determine on which host they are running. And btw, I'll remove this dependency from hostnames. We should use

[arch-dev-public] pkgstats: second try

2010-09-10 Thread Pierre Schmitz
and not just nice to see. If you have any suggestions or ideas let me know. I think once this is working properly we should make another announcement to get helpful stats for a package cleanup or some mirroring improvements. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] pkgstats: second try

2010-09-10 Thread Pierre Schmitz
pkgstats) One thing I could do though is to allow more than one submission per ip and day. what would be a reasonable value? Like 10 submission per ip within 24h? Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta_17 4_g41bc-1

2010-09-09 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Hi all, this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very strange) upstream versioning scheme. Please test it, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] The Great Python Rebuild of 2010 begins

2010-09-09 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:05:47 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:48:06 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Just a reminder for people to look at their packages and rebuild them for this. We seem to of stalled majorly... Do you think a community

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta-7

2010-09-06 Thread Pierre Schmitz
So, here is another xz release. The upstream change from pkgrel=6 that actually changes relevant code among some translation fixes is xz: Use an array instead of pointer for stdin_filename. Please sign off, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] archbuild: building in a chroot for the lazy

2010-09-06 Thread Pierre Schmitz
than once at the same time. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Junior developers and [staging]

2010-09-05 Thread Pierre Schmitz
dbscripts. There is no point in assuming that there are evil developers. dbscripts should probably check whether a package with the same pkgname-pkgver-pkgrel triple is already in any other repository and then allow/deny adding it. That is a plan. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] Junior developers and [staging]

2010-09-05 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:36:08 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:53:59 +0200, Thomas Bächler dbscripts should probably check whether a package with the same pkgname-pkgver-pkgrel triple is already in any other repository and then allow/deny adding

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta-6

2010-09-05 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Hi all, this is a new recommended upstream snapshot (see http://tukaani.org/xz/) Please sign off, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] dbscripts fails to move split packages

2010-09-05 Thread Pierre Schmitz
] (x86_64) == Removing left over lock from [testing] (x86_64) is it safe to do it manually ? false alarm. it looks like only the output is kinda wrong :) What's wrong with the output here? vim-runtime is not the pkgbase of a split package. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

[arch-dev-public] new lighttpd package

2010-08-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Hi, I am about to move lighttpd 1.4.28 to [extra]. Take care of the upstream changes; especially if you are using ipv6. I have also rewritten the rc script to use lighttpd-angel and hopefully made it more robust. This way graceful reload and shutdown is now supported. -- Pierre Schmitz, https

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.4-1

2010-08-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
) rebuilding the module fix the problem. to be safe, i think we should rebuild all modules done and checked in, greetings tpowa anyone for i686? The i915 module is still broken on i8xx but everything else seems fine. Signing off for i686. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] The Great Python Rebuild of 2010 begins

2010-08-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
and devtools; I'd like to do a new release soon anyway. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] archbuild: building in a chroot for the lazy

2010-08-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
... I don't really know what you are doing here. ;-) Some more detailed steps how to reproduce it would be helpful. For future versions I could try to add some kind of locking and more robust checks if there are mount point within the target dir. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.9 changes

2010-08-24 Thread Pierre Schmitz
. The nvidia driver seems to work fine with that option so I have put it into a testing package for now. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] testing2x error

2010-08-24 Thread Pierre Schmitz
-scripts doesn't seem to be recommend. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] testing2x error

2010-08-24 Thread Pierre Schmitz
stuffs. Talked to Jan and Thomas about this at Froscon. Jan suggested to update the Xen-Host and reboot it. Problem: we'll need someone in place (Dale) in case it wont boot up again. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] At last, clean multilib support

2010-08-23 Thread Pierre Schmitz
. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

[arch-dev-public] archbuild: building in a chroot for the lazy

2010-08-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
using file:// are supported. This is in early stage and far from ready. So feedback and feature request are more than welcome. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] kde 4.5.0

2010-08-18 Thread Pierre Schmitz
-- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] kde 4.5.0

2010-08-18 Thread Pierre Schmitz
(if they are no longer able to login) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] kde 4.5.0

2010-08-18 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:37:55 +0200, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:19:29 +0200, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 11:06 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: so

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] commitpkg script than handle better splitted package

2010-08-18 Thread Pierre Schmitz
this cannot be implemented in the near future. The problem are not devtools but dbscripts and especially our svn repo layout. I have some ideas for this though. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Large packages in repositories

2010-08-17 Thread Pierre Schmitz
day) So for now its to sue a separate PKGBUILD if an any package is really needed. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] /dev/shm permissions and building in chroot

2010-08-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
soon. (Unfortunately I also lost some code which I somehow missed to backup) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

[arch-dev-public] Important: upcoming dbscripts release

2010-08-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
rebuild party) with CLEANUP_DRYRUN enabled during the first days. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Important: upcoming dbscripts release

2010-08-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
are using the proper rsync flag(s). Dale We already use symlinks for our any packages which are implemented for a long time. Thomas already created the pool dirs and they are synced correctly on our tier1 servers. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] /dev/shm permissions and building in chroot

2010-08-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
/devtools.git/commit/?id=f7b67c25ff4a3f1f290c29a70500292344c59a1e -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
. Also dbscripts and devtools should know about this repo which is trivial. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mdadm-3.1.3-1

2010-08-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:00:15 +0200, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: anyone? I can only tell that it didn't break my existing raid setup on x86_64. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.1-1

2010-08-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:11:38 +0200, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 11.08.2010 13:02, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:25:07 +0200, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Upstream update, please test and sign off. We should probably be able to move

[arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
or suggestions. Thanks for reading, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:34:30 +0200, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 11.08.2010 17:29, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Even if you don't see the benefit right now I would be pleased to at least give it a try. No. I want to see the benefit before giving it a try. So, we are adding

Re: [arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
this will make more people use it. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:43:15 +0200, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:29 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: testing: * don't break packages intentionally * don't push incomplete rebuilds staging: * a global staging repository for collaboration its more

Re: [arch-dev-public] FluxBB update round two

2010-08-10 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:05:42 -0500, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Hi all, there is a new FluxBB release (1.4.2: http://fluxbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=4504) I have tested the update locally (with innodb

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 1.0.0a-3

2010-08-10 Thread Pierre Schmitz
the proposed upstream patch http://marc.info/?l=openssl-devm=128129628800826w=2 (it's not in cvs yet though, but at least it should not harm) Of course the test suite is still passed and the mention cert no longer crashes openssl. Please sign off. Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] FluxBB update round two

2010-08-10 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:55:35 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Hi all, there is a new FluxBB release (1.4.2: http://fluxbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=4504) I have tested the update locally (with innodb this time). They have enlarged the post.message column from text

[arch-dev-public] FluxBB update round two

2010-08-09 Thread Pierre Schmitz
, is it correct that we can keep the forums online then?) If nobody objects I'll do the update tonight. (about now + 13h) Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Finally: unit testing for our dbscritps

2010-08-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
need some admin to setup the dirs on gerolde and sigurd. (maybe rsync needs to be adjusted, too) Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Finally: unit testing for our dbscritps

2010-08-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:49:12 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 09:44:22 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: It would be great to get the package pool stuff pushed before the great python transition of 2010. In short: we are ready to go. I just need

[arch-dev-public] Finally: unit testing for our dbscritps

2010-08-07 Thread Pierre Schmitz
to check dbscripts) I'll add some more tests and hopefully new features to our dbscripts can be added more easily without the fear of major breakage. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-2

2010-08-04 Thread Pierre Schmitz
, please someone with the b43 problem test if this is fixed). sign off i686 -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-03 Thread Pierre Schmitz
and everything seems to work so far. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-08-03 Thread Pierre Schmitz
, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: Update to FluxBB 1.4.1

2010-07-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:05:48 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:54:54 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: So, next update: The actual update script is finally running now. I had to increase the FcgidIOTimeout as apache kept killing the update

Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: Update to FluxBB 1.4.1

2010-07-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:18:10 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: ...working on the update again. Will hopefully back online soon. The update is complete now. But it seems the server is running at its limit. We should definitely review our db config...there is something quite wrong

Re: [arch-dev-public] MediaWiki updated

2010-07-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:19:41 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:26:22 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Hi all, I updated MediaWiki due to some security issues. I hope you don't mind that it will look a little different from the other sites

Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: Update to FluxBB 1.4.1

2010-07-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:42:24 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Hi all, I have finished my preparation for the FluxBB update. The whole concept can be found at my profile page: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Pierre#FluxBB_1.4_Upgrade This will take about 3 hours

Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: Update to FluxBB 1.4.1

2010-07-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
nothing special. The dump is about 850 MByte. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: Update to FluxBB 1.4.1

2010-07-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
. Especially because it runs within a browser and not on cli. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: Update to FluxBB 1.4.1

2010-07-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:54:54 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: So, next update: The actual update script is finally running now. I had to increase the FcgidIOTimeout as apache kept killing the update script. Once all this is done (in about 200 hours ;-)) we should look

[arch-dev-public] MediaWiki updated

2010-07-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
are logged in. I don't see this effect locally or on wiki.archlinux.de with the same wiki. Did I miss anything? Some strange caching? Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] MediaWiki updated

2010-07-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:26:22 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: There is a strange problem though: all links are underlined if you are logged in. I don't see this effect locally or on wiki.archlinux.de with the same wiki. Did I miss anything? Some strange caching? Forget about

Re: [arch-dev-public] MediaWiki updated

2010-07-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:26:22 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Hi all, I updated MediaWiki due to some security issues. I hope you don't mind that it will look a little different from the other sites for a short time...but I didn't really want to create a new branch just

[arch-dev-public] Update to FluxBB 1.4

2010-07-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
. Some additional notes: * I didn't get a response from the guy with the duplicate account yet * Obviously some previous migrations failed so I need to cleanup the database schema. (there are duplicate or unused keys) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Update to FluxBB 1.4

2010-07-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:50:48 +0300, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/20/2010 06:15 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: * I didn't get a response from the guy with the duplicate account yet delete it if is problematic? No, I'll just rename the user and send him a mail with the new login

Re: [arch-dev-public] Update to FluxBB 1.4

2010-07-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
just fit. There is 3.2GB free disc space and the bbs database takes 1.2GB. Once everything is running the phpbb database can be removed. (I can keep a local dump file in my home dir for some time though...just in case) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Update to FluxBB 1.4

2010-07-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:19 -0500, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:59:35 -0500, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com We also do not have enough room to dump and reload a second copy of the DB. Any

Re: [arch-dev-public] Update to FluxBB 1.4

2010-07-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:29:43 -0500, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe we can shoot for some day next week. Yes, there is no real hurry. This also gives some time to prepare some stuff like resizing the partition as Thomas suggested. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] gcc 4.5 bug - what to do?

2010-07-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
the package with gcc 4.4 (there are mirrors containing old packages) and accept that this is an ugly but temporary workaround. You should also open a bug report on our bug tracker and link to the upstream one. Last but not least don't forget to blame Allan. ;-) -- Pierre Schmitz, https

Re: [arch-dev-public] bbs.archlinux.org is now switched to https only!

2010-07-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
compatible client is not needed here. (at least if you haven't altered the ssl config) Point 2) is afaik a known wget bug. (I wonder if there is a patch) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] bbs.archlinux.org is now switched to https only!

2010-07-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
bar with a big red strikethrough. :P Sure, you have to install the root certs from cacert.org. Or better: Don't use Windows. :P -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 2/2] checkpkg: Improve output message

2010-07-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:22:08 -0400, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: I altered the first patch to use mktemp -d; the second didn't apply but I did the minor change by hand. -- Pierre Schmitz, https

Re: [arch-dev-public] wine moved in community

2010-07-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
that. No objections: go ahead. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 2/2] checkpkg: Improve output message

2010-07-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
I altered the first patch to use mktemp -d; the second didn't apply but I did the minor change by hand. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Python-3.x transition with python-2.7 update

2010-07-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
by then. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Python-3.x transition with python-2.7 update

2010-07-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:25:32 -0500, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 08/07/10 18:34, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:56:39 +1000, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote: I will schedule this for the week

Re: [arch-dev-public] Python-3.x transition with python-2.7 update

2010-07-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
only contain candidates for extra. And I guess as you wouldn't push an rc to extra you shouldn't put it into testing either. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] udev-158-1

2010-06-29 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:58:48 +0200, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys, udev 158 Bugfixes. greetings tpowa sign off both. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] [makechrootpkg] Fixed changelog support to work with makepkg 3.4

2010-06-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [devtools] [PATCH] read {SRC, PKG}DEST from user makepkg.conf

2010-06-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
/makepkg.conf /dev/null 21; then -- 1.7.1 Could you resent this patch? It seems broken. In doubt just send as an attachement and not inline. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] [makechrootpkg] Fixed changelog support to work with makepkg 3.4

2010-06-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:18:14 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 28/06/10 16:07, Pierre Schmitz wrote: I will apply this for now as we handle the install files the same way. In future we should come up with a better solution though. It's quite easy to write a PKGBUILD where

Re: [arch-dev-public] [devtools] [PATCH] read {SRC, PKG}DEST from user makepkg.conf

2010-06-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:50:28 +0200, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On Monday 28 June 2010 08:16:06 Pierre Schmitz wrote: Could you resent this patch? It seems broken. In doubt just send as an attachement and not inline. applied. I'll package a new devtools release soon

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libevent 1.4.14b-1

2010-06-28 Thread Pierre Schmitz
on Solaris, elsewhere (6cbea13) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] sourceballs: Added community and community-testing support

2010-06-27 Thread Pierre Schmitz
-scripts/sourceballs-cleanup |5 +++-- 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/config b/config index 57ae64b..1cd533f 100644 applied, thanks. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.2p7-2

2010-06-26 Thread Pierre Schmitz
off both (though I have no fingerprint sensors) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Policy on cross-repo makedepends?

2010-06-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
in their PKGBUILD. (I currently do it myself using a local dejagnu package). I would just go ahead do it, but our integrity check script list makedepends repo hierarchy amongst the list of issues. I think it's fine to have core packages depending on some of the extra repo at build time. -- Pierre

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] nvidia, nvidia-utils 256.35-1

2010-06-23 Thread Pierre Schmitz
://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18486 Just let me know if things still work; especially for those using vdpau and opencl as I don't have recent hardware to test. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] commitpkg: add newline to make output look more orderly

2010-06-22 Thread Pierre Schmitz
. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] dbscripts pkg pools

2010-06-22 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:31:01 -0500, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: 1) Do a little test locally (help is more than welcome here) Testing the db-scripts is always tedious. Any ideas to speed up testing

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.4.0-2

2010-06-22 Thread Pierre Schmitz
it should not be the default. Just my 2 cents on sane default values. I agree with Thomas here; the common case should be the default; not the rare corner case. At least on Arch you don't have mixed architectures anyway. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] Committing multi-arch split packages

2010-06-21 Thread Pierre Schmitz
don't even know how easy it is to implement. PS: the new makepkg allows you to have a different pkgver/pkgrel for split packages or just build one of them. You cannot use these features either and I don't know if I will add those in the future. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] SVN repository maintenance

2010-06-21 Thread Pierre Schmitz
or so hours from start to finish. Does anyone have any objections with me doing this sometime tonight, e.g. 22nd June from 3 AM UTC - 7 AM UTC? -Dan Sure, go ahead. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [Bug] db-scripts fail to remove split package

2010-06-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:36:35 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 19/06/10 22:27, Pierre Schmitz wrote: So if you remove split packages in the PKGBUILD you also have to remove it from the db. Maybe someone could write a patch for check_packages.py to detect such orphaned packages

Re: [arch-dev-public] dbscripts pkg pools

2010-06-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:36:04 -0500, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Fri, 07 May 2010 14:35:55 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Btw: I cannot checkout your repo warning: remote HEAD

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34-2

2010-06-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
/Features/HalRemoval for more. For KDE hal is still needed (storage devices, power management etc.) This might change with KDE 4.6 next year. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [Bug] db-scripts fail to remove split package

2010-06-19 Thread Pierre Schmitz
such packages. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34-2

2010-06-19 Thread Pierre Schmitz
changes in the nouveau module) Or does xorg-server 1.7 work with the new kernel? (there is a chance I am mixing up things) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

[arch-dev-public] Poor man's mirror redirector

2010-06-14 Thread Pierre Schmitz
/GetFileFromMirror.php -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] coreutils - remove i18n patch?

2010-06-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:32:36 +0300, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: imo i think we should drop it and take this issue upstream. Correct. Which are the issues we are talking about btw? -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] coreutils - remove i18n patch?

2010-06-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:34:19 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 12/06/10 21:23, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:32:36 +0300, Ionuț Bîrubiru.io...@gmail.com wrote: imo i think we should drop it and take this issue upstream. Correct. Which are the issues we

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mpfr-3.0.0-1, gcc-4.5.0-6 and libmpc-0.8.2-2

2010-06-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:40:07 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 12/06/10 01:13, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Seems to work now. Although this bug is still present: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19734 Was that ever fixed in our gcc? No, the last working gcc was 4.4 I see the bug

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta-4

2010-06-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
new upstream snapshot. Please sign off. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta-5

2010-06-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:20:04 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: new upstream snapshot. Please sign off. A new snapshot was released (afaik only build system changes). But here is a new package anyway. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mpfr-3.0.0-1 and gcc-4.5.0-5

2010-06-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
.patch || return 1 - I just checked with chromium...it now segfaults on startup again; I guess the same applies to KDE/khtml. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mpfr-3.0.0-1, gcc-4.5.0-6 and libmpc-0.8.2-2

2010-06-11 Thread Pierre Schmitz
this bug is still present: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19734 -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Do not refer to $startdir/{src, pkg} in PKGBUILDs

2010-06-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
available under srcdir? -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Do not refer to $startdir/{src, pkg} in PKGBUILDs

2010-06-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
been telling people not to use $startdir/pkg for more that a year, maybe even two years... No problem then. Maybe we could sed all $startdir/{pkg,src} usage in trunk for the remaining packages. This way startdir will be gone sooner or later. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >