May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
announcement draft:
---8<-8<
ABS 2.0 In Testing
With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
tree, as part of the changes that needed to be made for our internal
move from CVS
2008/4/12, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
> announcement draft:
>
> ---8<-8<
> ABS 2.0 In Testing
>
> With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
> tree, as part of
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds fine to me except #3 - I don't understand it (and I probably
> some users will too).
> Can you explain it please?
Basically, if you had to allow certain ports access to the net through
a firewall. rsync uses di
On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
> announcement draft:
>
> ---8<-8<
> ABS 2.0 In Testing
>
> With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
> tree, as
Travis Willard schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds fine to me except #3 - I don't understand it (and I probably
some users will too).
Can you explain it please?
Basically, if you had to allow certain ports access to the net through
a fi
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I wouldn't mention that at all. Just mention it now uses rsync, whoever
filters outbound traffic will know exactly what to do.
That's also what I was thinking.
It already mentions that rsync is used, but I would insist on it, for
example, by changing 1) to something l
So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
> ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
>
Oh, and revised draft:
---8<-8<
ABS 2.0 In Testing
With version 2, ABS has move
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
> > ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
> >
>
> Oh, and revised draft:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
> > ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
> >
>
> Oh, and revised draft:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
> ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
For the record, I think announcing the SVN move is a tad silly. People
don't care how we manage our repos, and if th
12 matches
Mail list logo