On Oct 3, 2012 3:42 AM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Any thoughts?
That's fine, in my opinion. People running Btrfs shouldn't be
Hi guys,
With systemd-193 and linux-3.6 we will finally have reliable support
for btrfs multi-device filesystems (assembling them used to be racy).
However, the added udev rules that makes this work do not work at all
on pre-3.6 kernels. We could keep the old (racey) rules in the btrfs
package
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
With systemd-193 and linux-3.6 we will finally have reliable support
for btrfs multi-device filesystems (assembling them used to be racy).
However, the added udev rules that makes this work do not work at all
on
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Any thoughts?
That's fine, in my opinion. People running Btrfs shouldn't be using an
LTS kernel anyway.
Same opinion but can you think about updating
Am 03.10.2012 01:30, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
Hi guys,
With systemd-193 and linux-3.6 we will finally have reliable support
for btrfs multi-device filesystems (assembling them used to be racy).
However, the added udev rules that makes this work do not work at all
on pre-3.6 kernels. We could
5 matches
Mail list logo
