Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:43:29 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > Their reasoning (which I guess I agree with) is that giving users > access to usb sticks (among other things) causes security probems (the > user logged in over ssh can access the usb stick of the logged in > user). FWIW, I think what you

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > To make a long story short; in stead of fixing the "storage" group, I > intend to remove support for it from udev, and direct people to use > udisks instead. Or, if they don't want udisks, then su root. Given how much damage you can do with

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

[2011-08-28 00:43:29 +0200] Tom Gundersen: > To make a long story short; in stead of fixing the "storage" group, I > intend to remove support for it from udev, and direct people to use > udisks instead. If anyone have any objections, pleas let me know. That sounds very good to me. -- Gaetan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > I'm refactoring our support for the "storage" group, due to a recent > bug report about it being incomplete: > . I thought I'd ask for some > input. I did a bit more digging and asking around, and it s

[arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group

Hi guys, I'm refactoring our support for the "storage" group, due to a recent bug report about it being incomplete: . I thought I'd ask for some input. A few words about the usage of the storage group: For most people the storage group is not needed any mor