Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 16:29:03 schrieb Giovanni Scafora:
> ln -s /srv/http/cgi-bin/htsearch ${pkgdir}/usr/bin || return 1
I thnik it should be the other way round. Imho no package should install
anything into /srv.
What do you guys think about this?
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Str
2009/4/25, Pierre Schmitz :
> I thnik it should be the other way round. Imho no package should install
> anything into /srv.
>
> What do you guys think about this?
I think that is right.
Moreover, there are documentation files in /srv/http/htdocs/
--
Arch Linux Developer (voidnull)
AUR & Pac
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 16:29:03 schrieb Giovanni Scafora:
ln -s /srv/http/cgi-bin/htsearch ${pkgdir}/usr/bin || return 1
I thnik it should be the other way round. Imho no package should install
anything into /srv.
What do you guys think about this?
FHS
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 16:29:03 schrieb Giovanni Scafora:
>>
>>>
>>> ln -s /srv/http/cgi-bin/htsearch ${pkgdir}/usr/bin || return 1
>>>
>>
>> I thnik it should be the other way round. Imho no package should inst
> Installing into /srv/ is no different than installing into /home/,
> IMO. It might be worse as it presents a relatively big security risk
> for those that do run public facing services, and suddenly a new
> script has been made available for web site users to run.
if you think so I could change
2009/4/25, Dan McGee :
> Installing into /srv/ is no different than installing into /home/,
> IMO. It might be worse as it presents a relatively big security risk
> for those that do run public facing services, and suddenly a new
> script has been made available for web site users to run.
Then,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2009/4/25, Dan McGee :
>> Installing into /srv/ is no different than installing into /home/,
>> IMO. It might be worse as it presents a relatively big security risk
>> for those that do run public facing services, and suddenly a new
>>
On 25/04/2009, Dan McGee wrote:
> I would just say/think that files in /srv/ should be managed by the
> system admin and not pacman- anything they want in there should be
> linked by the sysadmin from /usr/bin/ or elsewhere, rather than the
> other way around.
You are right.
so voidnull is fixing
2009/4/25, Andrea Scarpino :
> You are right.
> so voidnull is fixing this soon, because I'm not in my home.
Fixed.
--
Arch Linux Developer (voidnull)
AUR & Pacman Italian Translations
Microdia Developer
http://www.archlinux.it
Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 17:36:19 schrieb Dan McGee:
> Installing into srv is no different than installing into /home/,
> IMO. It might be worse as it presents a relatively big security risk
> for those that do run public facing services, and suddenly a new
> script has been made available for we
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 16:29:03 schrieb Giovanni Scafora:
ln -s /srv/http/cgi-bin/htsearch ${pkgdir}/usr/bin || return 1
I thnik it should be the other way round. Imho no package should install
anything into /srv.
What do you guys think about this?
There should
11 matches
Mail list logo