On 24/07/10 02:55, Dan Vratil wrote:
I tried the latest version of mailman (2.1.13) as you suggested. I used the
PKGBUILD from SVN trunk, but I modified it, so that it does not require
/home/mailman and mailman user and group to exist during build and I modified
the mailman.install file so that u
On 25/07/10 21:40, Allan McRae wrote:
On 24/07/10 02:55, Dan Vratil wrote:
I tried the latest version of mailman (2.1.13) as you suggested. I
used the
PKGBUILD from SVN trunk, but I modified it, so that it does not require
/home/mailman and mailman user and group to exist during build and I
modi
Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:16:46 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> On 25/07/10 21:40, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 24/07/10 02:55, Dan Vratil wrote:
> >> I tried the latest version of mailman (2.1.13) as you suggested. I
> >> used the
> >> PKGBUILD from SVN trunk, but I modified it, so that it does not
> >>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:26:07 +0200, Andreas Radke
wrote:
> Done. Packages are in testing. I hope the update will go smooth. Once
> it is tested our overlord should take care to restart the daemon...
>
> Maybe somebody knows how to create a user/group as regular user inside
> a PKGBUILD.
>
> Pleas
Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:48:14 +0200
schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
> I fear its pretty much broken this way. You cannot add groups/users
> within the build function as this would only affect the system you are
> building on. This stuff has to be done in install scripts. See other
> packages like filesyst
On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote:
New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please
try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke
something.
Has anybody tested the version of mailman in [testing]? This will need
to be moved before the py
6 matches
Mail list logo
