Re: [arch-dev-public] [idea] Kernel Release Policy

2008-10-06 Thread Dusty Phillips
2008/10/6 James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Devs, >> >> >> So my major point is: The only thing I want to really change is while >> the newer .x kernel is been prepped for released, Arch does not abandon >> the current .x kerne

Re: [arch-dev-public] [idea] Kernel Release Policy

2008-10-06 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Montag 06 Oktober 2008 schrieb James Rayner: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > > > > > So my major point is: The only thing I want to really change is while > > the newer .x kernel is been prepped for released, Arch does not abandon > > the curren

Re: [arch-dev-public] [idea] Kernel Release Policy

2008-10-06 Thread James Rayner
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Devs, > > > So my major point is: The only thing I want to really change is while > the newer .x kernel is been prepped for released, Arch does not abandon > the current .x kernel. Whoa, could have said that at the start :p The

[arch-dev-public] [idea] Kernel Release Policy

2008-10-05 Thread Jud
Hi Devs, Please do not take this a complaint, I am a fan of consistent improvement and I hope after reading this you'll agree there is some room for improvement and by working together it can be realised. After the disaster of early the early upstream kernel 2.6.25 releases (many annoying minor p