Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12.1-2

2010-10-08 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 07.10.2010 01:29, schrieb Allan McRae: A few maintenance changes: - pull latest upstream snapshot from 2.12 branch  (only a couple of minor bugfixes) - Fedora patch to not optimize so much during linking for those

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12.1-2

2010-10-08 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 02:29, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: A few maintenance changes: - pull latest upstream snapshot from 2.12 branch  (only a couple of minor bugfixes) Does it fix this: http://securityreason.com/securityalert/7822 ? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12.1-2

2010-10-07 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2010-10-07 09:29:52 +1000] Allan McRae: A few maintenance changes: signoff i686

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12.1-2

2010-10-07 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 07.10.2010 01:29, schrieb Allan McRae: A few maintenance changes: - pull latest upstream snapshot from 2.12 branch (only a couple of minor bugfixes) - Fedora patch to not optimize so much during linking for those i686 machines that do not handle it. Real fix will be in binutils-2.21

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12.1-2

2010-10-06 Thread Allan McRae
A few maintenance changes: - pull latest upstream snapshot from 2.12 branch (only a couple of minor bugfixes) - Fedora patch to not optimize so much during linking for those i686 machines that do not handle it. Real fix will be in binutils-2.21 - Gentoo patch to fix static linking