Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 11/11/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Can we have one more i686? signoff i686 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Thomas Bächler schrieb: Minor upstream update, please sign off. Tested on x86_64 only. Btw, we should have a "fast to core" policy for minor kernel updates, which means they should be signed off within 24 hours - let's try it. Can we have one more i686? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-10 Thread Ionut Biru
On 11/10/2009 08:57 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Minor upstream update, please sign off. Tested on x86_64 only. Btw, we should have a "fast to core" policy for minor kernel updates, which means they should be signed off within 24 hours - let's try it. signoff x86_64 -- Ionut

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-10 Thread Dan McGee
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Dienstag 10 November 2009 19:57:43 schrieb Thomas Bächler: >> signed off >> > x86_64 Signoff i686 -Dan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-10 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Dienstag 10 November 2009 19:57:43 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > signed off > x86_64 -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.6-1

2009-11-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Minor upstream update, please sign off. Tested on x86_64 only. Btw, we should have a "fast to core" policy for minor kernel updates, which means they should be signed off within 24 hours - let's try it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature