Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] netcfg v2.1.1

2008-09-19 Thread Eric Belanger
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Thayer Williams wrote: On Sep 17, 2008 at 06:33 AM, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just an embarrassing one liner that explains a lot of dhcp problems that puzzled me. signoff 686 signoff both arches. FTR, I use a simple setup, no wireless. -- This message h

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] netcfg v2.1.1

2008-09-18 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:33:38 +1000 schrieb "James Rayner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Just an embarrassing one liner that explains a lot of dhcp problems > that puzzled me. > my netbook doesn't pull final 2.1.0 claiming 2.1.0_RC1-1 is newer... maybe you should set options=('force') even for later re

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] netcfg v2.1.1

2008-09-17 Thread Thayer Williams
On Sep 17, 2008 at 06:33 AM, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just an embarrassing one liner that explains a lot of dhcp problems > that puzzled me. signoff 686

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] netcfg v2.1.1

2008-09-17 Thread James Rayner
Just an embarrassing one liner that explains a lot of dhcp problems that puzzled me.