On 22/03/11 00:08, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb Allan McRae:
On 17/03/11 04:46, Dan McGee wrote:
Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb Allan McRae:
> On 17/03/11 04:46, Dan McGee wrote:
> > Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
> > observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
> > http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS
> >
> > @Everyone for F
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 17/03/11 06:42, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:31:07 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
On 17/03/11 06:42, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:31:07 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
http://projects.ar
On 17/03/11 04:46, Dan McGee wrote:
Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS
@Everyone for FYI, Allan for suggestions:
13:39< bash`> error: failed to commi
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:31:07 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
>> observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
>> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS
>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Griffin
> wrote:
>> You can do it "GNU style" and only read from stdin if the package list is "-"
>
> OMG, Aaron is here!
:)
> That sounds like the way to go, or we are going to cause regressions
> to an
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
> observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS
>
> @Everyone for FYI, Allan for suggestions:
>
> 13:39 < bash`
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>>> [2011-03-16 15:10:08 -0500] Dan McGee:
2. This is a terrible bug report. :/ I need output when you run this
by hand, ma
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> [2011-03-16 15:10:08 -0500] Dan McGee:
>>> 2. This is a terrible bug report. :/ I need output when you run this
>>> by hand, maybe with --debug, etc. Help me help you by actually
>>> provi
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-03-16 15:10:08 -0500] Dan McGee:
>> 2. This is a terrible bug report. :/ I need output when you run this
>> by hand, maybe with --debug, etc. Help me help you by actually
>> providing details.
>
> I thought it was reproducible well enou
[2011-03-16 15:10:08 -0500] Dan McGee:
> 2. This is a terrible bug report. :/ I need output when you run this
> by hand, maybe with --debug, etc. Help me help you by actually
> providing details.
I thought it was reproducible well enough. There is no debug output:
yes | pacman -S --debug
[2011-03-16 21:10:22 +0100] Gaetan Bisson:
> [2011-03-16 13:46:21 -0500] Dan McGee:
> > Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great
>
> With pacman-3.5.0-1, when I do:
>
> yes n | pacman -Syu
>
> (which I use in a script to print possible upgrades without doing
> anything), pacman st
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-03-16 13:46:21 -0500] Dan McGee:
>> Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great
>
> With pacman-3.5.0-1, when I do:
>
> yes n | pacman -Syu
>
> (which I use in a script to print possible upgrades without doing
> anything),
[2011-03-16 13:46:21 -0500] Dan McGee:
> Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great
With pacman-3.5.0-1, when I do:
yes n | pacman -Syu
(which I use in a script to print possible upgrades without doing
anything), pacman starts eating up all the RAM until OOM kills it.
--
Gaetan
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:46:21 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
> observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS
Thanks to everybody involved!
I'll give my signoff after I
Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any
observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS
@Everyone for FYI, Allan for suggestions:
13:39 < bash`> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
13:39
17 matches
Mail list logo
