[arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-13 Thread Dan McGee
The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :) Upstream NEWS/changes: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint Disregard the 4.0.1 stuff that isn't in this package yet and hasn't been actually releas

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee: > The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect > it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :) > > Upstream NEWS/changes: > http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint > Disregard the 4.0.1 stuff that isn't

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-13 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
On 2011/10/13 Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee: >> The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect >> it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :) >> >> Upstream NEWS/changes: >> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=m

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee: > The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect > it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :) > > Upstream NEWS/changes: > http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint > Disregard the 4.0.1 stuff that isn't

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee: The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :) Upstream NEWS/changes: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint Disr

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae: > On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run "pacman -S >> devtools" (still had namcap version 3.1) pacman wanted to install these >> pacakges: >> namcap-3.1-1 pacman-3.5.4-4 pyalpm-0.4.3-1 subv

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-14 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae: >> On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >>> I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run "pacman -S >>> devtools" (still had namcap version 3.1) pacman wanted to install these >>> pa

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 4.0.0-2

2011-10-14 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 14.10.2011 14:43, schrieb Dan McGee: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae: >>> On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote: I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run "pacman -S devtools" (still had namcap vers