The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect
it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :)
Upstream NEWS/changes:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint
Disregard the 4.0.1 stuff that isn't in this package yet and hasn't
been actually releas
Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee:
> The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect
> it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :)
>
> Upstream NEWS/changes:
> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint
> Disregard the 4.0.1 stuff that isn't
On 2011/10/13 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect
>> it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :)
>>
>> Upstream NEWS/changes:
>> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=m
Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee:
> The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect
> it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :)
>
> Upstream NEWS/changes:
> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint
> Disregard the 4.0.1 stuff that isn't
On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 13.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Dan McGee:
The most anticipated release EVER has landed in [testing]. Do I expect
it to make it out before we need a 4.0.1? Not really. :)
Upstream NEWS/changes:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?h=maint
Disr
Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae:
> On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run "pacman -S
>> devtools" (still had namcap version 3.1) pacman wanted to install these
>> pacakges:
>> namcap-3.1-1 pacman-3.5.4-4 pyalpm-0.4.3-1 subv
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>> I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run "pacman -S
>>> devtools" (still had namcap version 3.1) pacman wanted to install these
>>> pa
Am 14.10.2011 14:43, schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>> On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run "pacman -S
devtools" (still had namcap vers
8 matches
Mail list logo