On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > Er? No. Modprobe loads it. udev calls a script that calls modprobe. We
> > are not talking about where the CURRENT frambuffer blacklist exists,
> > because I'm sure
Am Sonntag, 9. März 2008 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Am Sonntag, 9. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann
> > >
Am Sonntag, 9. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 8 Mar 2
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>
>
> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600 "Aaron Griffin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600 "Aaron Griffin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > c) The *only* thing that is appropriate is to autoblacklist them via
> > > modprobe
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > c) The *only* thing that is appropriate is to autoblacklist them via
> > modprobe rules.. Doing it the previous way is absolute crap.
>
>
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600
"Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
Dan McGee schrieb:
, it's not
possible to block framebuffer loading by udev rules.
Can you please explain why? Thanks.
The current package has the rule
KERNEL=="fb[0-9]*", GOTO="hotplug_driver_loaded"
However, this rule cannot work: At the point where the driver is not
loaded, all you get
> > no signoff
> > please add the framebuffer blacklist again to load-modules.sh
>
> This is a terrible place for it, as I tried to explain on IRC. We
> should not explicitly block a set of modules here. If we don't want
> them, then why the hell do we even put them in our kernel?
There was a req
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Somehow, module loading is considerably faster here than before (even
> > > fast than with
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Somehow, module loading is considerably faster here than before (even
> > fast than with 118-2)
>
> Yeah, there were 2 filesystem globbing ba
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somehow, module loading is considerably faster here than before (even
> fast than with 118-2)
Yeah, there were 2 filesystem globbing based loops in there that were
the major killers... for every module load it was doing
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Thanks Thomas for pointing out that I was trying to install start_dev 8)
** Could someone build an i686 package for me, I have no remote access
to my i686 box **
Done.
Reverting back to the older way of doing things, with minor
improvements where they can be made
Crap, I missed the start_udev install.
I guess I didn't fully test support for half-upgraded systems (why are
we supporting this again? not sure, but people complained loudly
enough).
Thanks Thomas for pointing out that I was trying to install start_dev 8)
** Could someone build an i686 package f
16 matches
Mail list logo