Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib-1.2.3.3-1

On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Samstag, 5. Juli 2008 19:22:14 schrieb Thomas Bächler: Eric just asked me on IRC to post here, as he has no email right now: The zlib license is not in the right place. Damnit, this allways happens when I blindly trust namcap. I think I'll just rep

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib-1.2.3.3-1

Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2008 20:58:30 schrieb Jason Chu: > Is zlib used by anything in /lib? Did not find anything. -- http://www.archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib-1.2.3.3-1

On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated zlib to the latest upstream version and cleaned up the PKGBUILD. > It's installed to /usr instead of /. If there was a reason for doing this, > please complain. Is zlib used by anything in /lib? That

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib-1.2.3.3-1

Am Samstag, 5. Juli 2008 19:22:14 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Eric just asked me on IRC to post here, as he has no email right now: > The zlib license is not in the right place. Damnit, this allways happens when I blindly trust namcap. I think I'll just replace it by Eric in future. OK, we are at

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib-1.2.3.3-1

Pierre Schmitz schrieb: Hi all, I updated zlib to the latest upstream version and cleaned up the PKGBUILD. It's installed to /usr instead of /. If there was a reason for doing this, please complain. I know, this version isn't linked on zlib's homepage (which was updated sometime back in 200

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] zlib-1.2.3.3-1

Hi all, I updated zlib to the latest upstream version and cleaned up the PKGBUILD. It's installed to /usr instead of /. If there was a reason for doing this, please complain. I know, this version isn't linked on zlib's homepage (which was updated sometime back in 2005). But according to debia