On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 11:15 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 10:48 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's quite common knowledge that pygtk/pygobject programs are bad for
> > power usage. Newer versions of pygtk and pygobject contain code that
> > require
On Jan 10, 2008 10:48 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's quite common knowledge that pygtk/pygobject programs are bad for
> power usage. Newer versions of pygtk and pygobject contain code that
> requires API from python trunk to solve this issue. However, our python
> 2.
Hi all,
It's quite common knowledge that pygtk/pygobject programs are bad for
power usage. Newer versions of pygtk and pygobject contain code that
requires API from python trunk to solve this issue. However, our python
2.5 doesn't have that code.
http://blogs.gnome.org/johan/2008/01/04/enough-wak
2008/1/10, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> It's quite common knowledge that pygtk/pygobject programs are bad for
> power usage. Newer versions of pygtk and pygobject contain code that
> requires API from python trunk to solve this issue. However, our python
> 2.5 doesn't have that c
4 matches
Mail list logo