Am 23.01.2013 20:15, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer:
> Hello,
>
> I've cleaned all packages where I maintain rc scripts. Lukas J. has
> moved the legacy to a community[1] package[2].
FYI for Lukas: I removed initscripts support from openvpn, the scripts
are still in SVN.
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> On 8 November 2012 16:03, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
>>> It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts
>>> from their package would notify me, so I can keep then in a rc-sc
Good idea, +1.
To find deleted files that ends with .rc:
svn log -v | grep '^ *D.*/trunk/.*\.rc$'
D /fail2ban/trunk/fail2ban.rc
D /multipath-tools/trunk/multipathd.rc
D /virtualbox/trunk/vbox-service.rc
D /oidentd/trunk/oidentd.rc
D /ufw/trunk/ufw.rc
D /backuppc/trunk/backuppc-h
On 8 November 2012 16:03, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
>> It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts
>> from their package would notify me, so I can keep then in a rc-scripts
>> package as discussed previously (similar to what was
Le 2012-11-08 10:03, Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
As to forcibly removing all the rc scripts by a certain date, I guess
we could get back to that later once we see how things pan out? I'd be
fine with doing it, but don't see the urgency.
It would be gre
Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
>> As to forcibly removing all the rc scripts by a certain date, I guess
>> we could get back to that later once we see how things pan out? I'd be
>> fine with doing it, but don't see the urgency.
>
> It would be great if maintainers who are going to d
> As to forcibly removing all the rc scripts by a certain date, I guess
> we could get back to that later once we see how things pan out? I'd be
> fine with doing it, but don't see the urgency.
It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts
from their package would notify me
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> Unless there are any objections, I'll put this up soon so I can start
>> closing bugs without feeling bad about it ;-)
>>
>> -t
>>
>
> +1
>
> -Andy
Done.
-t
Am Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:52:31 +0100
schrieb Tom Gundersen :
> Unless there are any objections, I'll put this up soon so I can start
> closing bugs without feeling bad about it ;-)
>
> -t
>
+1
-Andy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> "As systemd is now the default init system, Arch Linux is receiving
> minimal testing on sysvinit/initscripts systems. Due to a lack of
> resources and interest, sysvinit/initscripts-specific bugs may now be
> closed as WONT FIX.
>
> We theref
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> * Publish an announcement with the said dates and a link to a migration
> guide
> * Support for initscripts can be dropped e.g. end of December. After
> that packages may drop support; but not before.
> * rc.d scripts and other related files
Hi all,
as systemd is now our default initsystem the current status of
initscripts is a little vague. The problem is not the initscripts
package itself but rc.d files and support in other packages. It is
unrealistic to think we can support two different init systems. Testing
on both systems is too
12 matches
Mail list logo
