Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-05-18 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 22 April 2014 20:58, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > On 6 April 2014 23:10, Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> On 31 March 2014 13:38, Guillaume Alaux wrote: >>> >>> On 30 March 2014 20:46, Guillaume Alaux wrote: >>> > On 30 March 2014 20:39, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >>> >> On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaum

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-04-22 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 6 April 2014 23:10, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > On 31 March 2014 13:38, Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> >> On 30 March 2014 20:46, Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> > On 30 March 2014 20:39, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> >> On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> >>> You might be talking about "icedt

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-04-06 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 31 March 2014 13:38, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > > On 30 March 2014 20:46, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > > On 30 March 2014 20:39, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > >> On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaume Alaux wrote: > >>> You might be talking about "icedtea-web" [0], the browser plugin that > >>> enables som

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-31 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 30 March 2014 20:46, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > On 30 March 2014 20:39, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaume Alaux wrote: >>> You might be talking about "icedtea-web" [0], the browser plugin that >>> enables some Java interpretation inside browsers? This is yet another >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 30 March 2014 20:39, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> You might be talking about "icedtea-web" [0], the browser plugin that >> enables some Java interpretation inside browsers? This is yet another >> project provided by the IcedTea team. > > Indeed. T

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaume Alaux wrote: > You might be talking about "icedtea-web" [0], the browser plugin that > enables some Java interpretation inside browsers? This is yet another > project provided by the IcedTea team. Indeed. Thank you for the clarification. Could you provide an op

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 30 March 2014 19:38, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Sun 30, March 16:14:17 Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> **We** (Arch Linux) do not patch anything here. We are just wondering >> which way to go between: >> 1- build from upstream OpenJDK by Oracle (the build process and result >> are kind of "dirty", i

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Sun 30, March 16:14:17 Guillaume Alaux wrote: > **We** (Arch Linux) do not patch anything here. We are just wondering > which way to go between: > 1- build from upstream OpenJDK by Oracle (the build process and result > are kind of "dirty", it builds against included libraries that are > shipped

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 30 March 2014 15:14, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 30.03.2014 11:21, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: >> I have been working on a package based on OpenJDK8 built from source >> but without IcedTea that I think would fit to our repos. I still have >> some work for it to be released but I would be in favor

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 30.03.2014 11:21, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > I have been working on a package based on OpenJDK8 built from source > but without IcedTea that I think would fit to our repos. I still have > some work for it to be released but I would be in favor of pushing > this "OpenJDK without IcedTea" to extra

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 30 March 2014 14:23, Allan McRae wrote: > On 30/03/14 21:36, Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> On 30 March 2014 11:46, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> >>> Am Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:21:25 +0200 >>> schrieb Guillaume ALAUX : >>> Hi devs, A new major version of Java went out recently [0]: "OpenJDK 8

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Allan McRae
On 30/03/14 21:36, Guillaume Alaux wrote: > On 30 March 2014 11:46, Andreas Radke wrote: >> >> Am Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:21:25 +0200 >> schrieb Guillaume ALAUX : >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> A new major version of Java went out recently [0]: "OpenJDK 8" but we >>> do not have a package for it (for the fol

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 30 March 2014 11:46, Andreas Radke wrote: > > Am Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:21:25 +0200 > schrieb Guillaume ALAUX : > > > Hi devs, > > > > A new major version of Java went out recently [0]: "OpenJDK 8" but we > > do not have a package for it (for the following reason) and some > > Archers are asking q

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:21:25 +0200 schrieb Guillaume ALAUX : > Hi devs, > > A new major version of Java went out recently [0]: "OpenJDK 8" but we > do not have a package for it (for the following reason) and some > Archers are asking questions [1] or flagging our openjdk7 package as > out of date

[arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8

2014-03-30 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
Hi devs, A new major version of Java went out recently [0]: "OpenJDK 8" but we do not have a package for it (for the following reason) and some Archers are asking questions [1] or flagging our openjdk7 package as out of date: All Linux distros - including Arch - build OpenJDK using the IcedTea pr