On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 14:14:35 Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> It looks quite OK to me, so I'm supporting this. They have quite good
> support for the proprietary formats. Bonus points for that they are
> willing to communicate and fix the problems, which isn't that common
> with proprietary software
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got an updated license from Kingsoft, most of the problems should have
> been addressed (except for the PRC export laws problem, which doesn't seem to
> be avoidable, but should not be a problem if I read the laws correctly...)
>
>
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 21:31:50 Allan McRae wrote:
> - Distributed as a deb file
> - Requires libpng12 (why is that in [community]...)
> - I don't trust licenses with multiple obvious typos
> - Is linking at runtime "integrating" with other software
> - Are dontations to Arch counted as us maki
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 06:41:47 Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2014-03-18 16:34:23 +0800] Felix Yan:
> > I recently received a license from Kingsoft to redistribute the office
> > productivity suite "kingsoft-office", and I want your opinion about if it
> > looks good to us, or if any modifications ha
[2014-03-18 16:34:23 +0800] Felix Yan:
> I recently received a license from Kingsoft to redistribute the office
> productivity suite "kingsoft-office", and I want your opinion about if it
> looks good to us, or if any modifications have to be made.
I skimmed through the license and Section 2 ind
Arch philosophy is to provide an open source software
distribution. We do allow exceptions where open source
software is not available or in very poor shape.
I can't see how this office suite would fit this.
I'm generally for avoiding closed stuff wherever possible.
-1
-Andy
signature.asc
De
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'm going to give some quick answers to what I
have in mind:
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 21:31:50 Allan McRae wrote:
> - Distributed as a deb file
> - Requires libpng12 (why is that in [community]...)
I've mentioned this to them just one day ago. Actually the PKGBUI
On 18/03/14 18:34, Felix Yan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently received a license from Kingsoft to redistribute the office
> productivity suite "kingsoft-office", and I want your opinion about if it
> looks good to us, or if any modifications have to be made.
>
> The product is an office suite writte
Hi,
I recently received a license from Kingsoft to redistribute the office
productivity suite "kingsoft-office", and I want your opinion about if it
looks good to us, or if any modifications have to be made.
The product is an office suite written in C++ and Qt, including three
components: Writ
9 matches
Mail list logo
