Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-10-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/10/13 21:17, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 18.10.2013 03:01, schrieb Allan McRae: >> On 17/10/13 01:18, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400 >>> schrieb Eric Bélanger : >>> I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of making !libtool the default in

Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-10-20 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 18.10.2013 03:01, schrieb Allan McRae: > On 17/10/13 01:18, Andreas Radke wrote: >> Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400 >> schrieb Eric Bélanger : >> >>> I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of >>> making !libtool the default in makepkg.conf. Currently, 104 packages >>> contai

Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-10-17 Thread Allan McRae
On 17/10/13 01:18, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400 > schrieb Eric Bélanger : > >> I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of >> making !libtool the default in makepkg.conf. Currently, 104 packages >> contains *.la files (mostly gambas stuff). We could che

Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-10-16 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400 schrieb Eric Bélanger : > I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of > making !libtool the default in makepkg.conf. Currently, 104 packages > contains *.la files (mostly gambas stuff). We could check which of > these packages really require the l

Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-10-15 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 29/09/13 17:36, Allan McRae wrote: > > All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added > > options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with > > the idea of enabling it by default. > > > > My plan is:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-10-14 Thread Allan McRae
On 29/09/13 17:36, Allan McRae wrote: > All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added > options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with > the idea of enabling it by default. > > My plan is: > - build pacman with updated makepkg.conf > - update devtools

Re: [arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-09-29 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Sounds good. The few packages that should need options=(!staticlibs) can just use that. Also, it would be possible to create a TODO for the packages that currently include static libraries. --- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

[arch-dev-public] Making !staticlibs the default in makepkg.conf

2013-09-29 Thread Allan McRae
All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with the idea of enabling it by default. My plan is: - build pacman with updated makepkg.conf - update devtools to have this in the makepkg.conf - set up a rebuild