Hi,
I was looking into updating the orphaned libldap and openldap packages
and couldn't help to notice that they should be in a splitted PKGBUILD
instead of two seperate PKGBUILD. It will remove duplicate work and
probably make the PKGBUILD cleaner especially the build function which
currently cd
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking into updating the orphaned libldap and openldap packages
> and couldn't help to notice that they should be in a splitted PKGBUILD
> instead of two seperate PKGBUILD. It will remove duplicate work and
> probably make the
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking into updating the orphaned libldap and openldap packages
> and couldn't help to notice that they should be in a splitted PKGBUILD
> instead of two seperate PKGBUILD. It will remove duplicate work and
> probably make the
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking into updating the orphaned libldap and openldap packages
>> and couldn't help to notice that they should be in a splitted PKGBUILD
>> instead of two seperate PKGBUIL
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Eric Bélanger
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was looking into updating the orphaned libldap and openldap packages
>>> and couldn't help to notice that they s
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Eric Bélanger
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into updating the orphaned libldap and
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 20:48 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Sure. I just did it in my WIP PKGBUILD to not forget.
>
> As no-one seems to know about the db moving part, I'm leaning into
> keeping --localstatedir=/var/lib/openldap. I'll wait for a day or two
> in case someone wants to pipe in, unless
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 20:48 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> Sure. I just did it in my WIP PKGBUILD to not forget.
>>
>> As no-one seems to know about the db moving part, I'm leaning into
>> keeping --localstatedir=/var/lib/openldap. I'll wait
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 20:48 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>> Sure. I just did it in my WIP PKGBUILD to not forget.
>>>
>>> As no-one seems to know about the db moving part, I'm leaning
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 20:48 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Sure. I just did it in my WIP PKGBUILD to not forget.
>>
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Uwe L. Korn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (as I have no write access to [arch-dev-public] I'm writing directly to you)
>
> as I'm the one currently active on
> FS#14598 - [openldap] enable slapd overlays (slapo)
> I would like to help getting the openldap package a bit nicer. A
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 05:40 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 20:48 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> >> Sure. I just did it in my WIP PKGBUILD to not forget.
> >>
> >> As no-one seems to know about the db moving part, I'm lean
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 05:40 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 20:48 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> >> Sure. I just did it in my WIP PKGBUILD to not forget.
>> >>
>>
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Coincidentally, I ran into the Debian patches tonight and was about to
> mention it here.
>
> We could patch to keep the db in the current location and have the
> socket in /run. Patching would be trivial and low-maintenance. That's
> probab
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 04:43:25AM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Coincidentally, I ran into the Debian patches tonight and was about to
> mention it here.
>
> We could patch to keep the db in the current location and have the
> socket in /run. Patching would be trivial and low-maintenance. That's
15 matches
Mail list logo
