On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Roman Kyrylych
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 15:16, Dan McGee wrote:
>> If they are syncing and up-to-date
>> (http://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/), then why remove them? That
>> seems pretty silly to me.
>
> No known admin email address or no response.
>
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 15:16, Dan McGee wrote:
> If they are syncing and up-to-date
> (http://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/), then why remove them? That
> seems pretty silly to me.
No known admin email address or no response.
No known upstream.
I agree that these may not be very solid reason
On 30 September 2010 14:16, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
>> On 30 September 2010 11:41, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>>> Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list
>>> and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearin
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> On 30 September 2010 11:41, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>> Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list
>> and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearing quite often.
>> However, not all mirrors are good
On 30 September 2010 11:41, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list
> and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearing quite often.
> However, not all mirrors are good ones (outdated, incomplete, admins
> don't respond, etc).
> I
Currently we have almost 90 active mirrors in the official mirror list
and new requests for becoming an official mirror are appearing quite often.
However, not all mirrors are good ones (outdated, incomplete, admins
don't respond, etc).
I marked inactive many of them during past months (including a
6 matches
Mail list logo
