Hi,
It's been over 7 years since the last upstream update and gamin provides
nearly all the functions without requiring a daemon and it uses inotify.
As for NFS support, gamin monitors local events so it won't affect users
having the home on NFS [1].
I think we shouldn't support dead software an
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> I think we shouldn't support dead software
As discussed on IRC: +1 from me.
-t
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 17:48 +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been over 7 years since the last upstream update and gamin provides
> nearly all the functions without requiring a daemon and it uses inotify.
>
> As for NFS support, gamin monitors local events so it won't affect users
> havi
On 21 August 2011 18:55, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> As discussed on IRC: +1 from me.
I'm in favour of removing fam, but please stop discussing decisions on IRC.
I cannot join our dev channel every day and it doesn't have a log file
accessible through the website neither and I'd like to know the
benefi
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On 21 August 2011 18:55, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> As discussed on IRC: +1 from me.
> I'm in favour of removing fam, but please stop discussing decisions on IRC.
> I cannot join our dev channel every day and it doesn't have a log file
> acce
On 21.08.2011 17:48, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been over 7 years since the last upstream update and gamin provides
> nearly all the functions without requiring a daemon and it uses inotify.
>
> As for NFS support, gamin monitors local events so it won't affect users
> having the home on
On 23 August 2011 16:21, Florian Pritz wrote:
> I create https://www.archlinux.org/todo/95/
I just moved fam to AUR.
--
Andrea
Hi,
I would like to remove fam from [extra]. It is old, uses dnotify rather
than the better inotify and does not build without lots of patches. It
seems the patches we do use create Arch specific issues with log file
filling (FS#14623). Finally, gamin does most of the job fam does but
bett
On Thursday 11 June 2009 08:22:45 am Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to remove fam from [extra]. It is old, uses dnotify rather
> than the better inotify and does not build without lots of patches. It
> seems the patches we do use create Arch specific issues with log file
> filling (FS#
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to remove fam from [extra]. It is old, uses dnotify rather
> than the better inotify and does not build without lots of patches. It
> seems the patches we do use create Arch specific issues with log file
> filling (FS#1462
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 17:14, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> I would like to remove fam from [extra]. It is old, uses dnotify rather
>> than the better inotify and does not build without lots of patches. It
>> seems the patches we do use create A
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 20:52, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 17:14, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> I would like to remove fam from [extra]. It is old, uses dnotify rather
>>> than the better inotify and does not build without lo
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:14 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> Every normal file manager should use inotify by itself and not depend
> on fam/gamin for that. What fam adds is the ability to monitor remote
> file systems IIRC, gamin does not add anything (of course it adds the
> basic functionality to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:14 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> Every normal file manager should use inotify by itself and not depend
>> on fam/gamin for that. What fam adds is the ability to monitor remote
>> file systems IIRC, gamin does not a
Since the response was mixed and it seems that this was going to be more
work than a simple removal, I just cleaned up the patching a bit and
rebuilt for the time being.
Allan
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 14:47, Allan McRae wrote:
> Since the response was mixed and it seems that this was going to be more
> work than a simple removal, I just cleaned up the patching a bit and rebuilt
> for the time being.
Hm, I thought that response was positive after reading the current
situa
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 14:47, Allan McRae wrote:
Since the response was mixed and it seems that this was going to be more
work than a simple removal, I just cleaned up the patching a bit and rebuilt
for the time being.
Hm, I thought that response was positive aft
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Maybe. If someone moves gamin to [extra] and all the packages with
> deps
> on fam change to gamin, then I will remove it. The were more
> packages
> needing rebuilt than I thought and I do not enough time to deal with
> all
> the rebuild
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Maybe. If someone moves gamin to [extra] and all the packages with
deps
on fam change to gamin, then I will remove it. The were more
packages
needing rebuilt than I thought and I do not enough time to deal with
all
19 matches
Mail list logo
