I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs:
mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils
These look like relatively lesser used packages... so if no one will
signoff on them, you can consider me signed off. (sdparm runs fine,
heh)
Any other packages stuck in testin
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this
thread to point out packages spending too long in testing
I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and
I do not know of anything holding it up.
Allan
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs:
mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils
These look like relatively lesser used packages... so if no one will
signoff on them, you can consider me signed off. (sdparm runs f
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this
thread to point out packages spending too long in testing
I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do
not know of anything hold
Eric Belanger schrieb:
I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now
and I do not know of anything holding it up.
Allan
boost has a bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10998
Also, boost needs this fix, it throws some ambiguity errors when
compiling pokerth (and othe
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs:
mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils
pccardctl eject works, so I guess this is a signoff for pcmciautils
(x86_64).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo