[arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps

I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs: mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils These look like relatively lesser used packages... so if no one will signoff on them, you can consider me signed off. (sdparm runs fine, heh) Any other packages stuck in testin

Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps

Aaron Griffin wrote: Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this thread to point out packages spending too long in testing I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do not know of anything holding it up. Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs: mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils These look like relatively lesser used packages... so if no one will signoff on them, you can consider me signed off. (sdparm runs f

Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Allan McRae wrote: Aaron Griffin wrote: Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this thread to point out packages spending too long in testing I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do not know of anything hold

Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps

Eric Belanger schrieb: I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do not know of anything holding it up. Allan boost has a bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10998 Also, boost needs this fix, it throws some ambiguity errors when compiling pokerth (and othe

Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps

Aaron Griffin schrieb: I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs: mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils pccardctl eject works, so I guess this is a signoff for pcmciautils (x86_64). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature