Re: [arch-dev-public] cairo xcb backend

2010-09-08 Thread Ronald van Haren
On 9/8/10, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 16:10 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: >> Fair enough, if enabling the xcb backend slows things down, especially >> if it is unmaintained so not likely to improve soon, we should remove >> it. >> It's a shame that awesome has to go but I'm sure

Re: [arch-dev-public] cairo xcb backend

2010-09-08 Thread Jan de Groot
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 16:10 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: > Fair enough, if enabling the xcb backend slows things down, especially > if it is unmaintained so not likely to improve soon, we should remove > it. > It's a shame that awesome has to go but I'm sure the people using > awesome know how to

Re: [arch-dev-public] cairo xcb backend

2010-09-08 Thread Ronald van Haren
On 9/8/10, Jan de Groot wrote: > Today Cairo 1.10.0 was flagged, so it's time to update soon again. > > I don't know when I will introduce the new package, as I'm still working > on passing the test suite included in it. Some of the tests fail here, > some even crash. One thing that will definitel

[arch-dev-public] cairo xcb backend

2010-09-08 Thread Jan de Groot
Today Cairo 1.10.0 was flagged, so it's time to update soon again. I don't know when I will introduce the new package, as I'm still working on passing the test suite included in it. Some of the tests fail here, some even crash. One thing that will definitely change is the included xcb backend. At