On 12/19/19 at 04:19pm, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I've created a bug[1] to follow a long overdue Xorg cleanup to drop
> legacy and dead code from our packages. This will require fixing
> makedepends in a 2nd step. I will do the most work over the next
> days/weeks. This all didn't
On 12/19/19 6:05 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> There's no package replacing libdmx and libxxf86dga so manual
>> intervention will be needed. So here's a small news draft:
>>
>> "Xorg cleanup requires manual intervention
>>
>> "In the process of Xorg cleanup [1] the update requires m
On 20/12/19 8:35 am, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Packages have been rebuilt and prepared to remove obsolete libdmx and
> libxxf86dga. Xorgproto legacy support has been removed and wherever it
> was added to be a runtime dependency it is now a build time
> dependency. Some packages wi
Em dezembro 19, 2019 19:45 Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public escreveu:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 23:35 Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
when updating, use:
`pacman -Rdd libdmx libxxf86dga && pacman -Syu`
Shouldn't we suggest -Rc instead of -Rdd h
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 23:35 Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
> when updating, use:
> `pacman -Rdd libdmx libxxf86dga && pacman -Syu`
>
Shouldn't we suggest -Rc instead of -Rdd here?
>
Packages have been rebuilt and prepared to remove obsolete libdmx and
libxxf86dga. Xorgproto legacy support has been removed and wherever it
was added to be a runtime dependency it is now a build time
dependency. Some packages will need additional xorgproto makedependency
added when missing some he
I've created a bug[1] to follow a long overdue Xorg cleanup to drop
legacy and dead code from our packages. This will require fixing
makedepends in a 2nd step. I will do the most work over the next
days/weeks. This all didn't fit well into a single ToDo list.
If you find more really dead Xorg pac
7 matches
Mail list logo
