Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Allan McRae
On 17/03/11 15:51, Ray Rashif wrote: On 17 March 2011 05:24, Dan McGee wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:50:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: On 17/03/11 06:39, Pierre Schmitz wrote: You are right, I missed that. I have no idea how to fix the te

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Ray Rashif
On 17 March 2011 05:24, Dan McGee wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:50:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >>> On 17/03/11 06:39, Pierre Schmitz wrote: You are right, I missed that. I have no idea how to fix the testing host with extra ch

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Allan McRae
On 17/03/11 07:21, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Btw: Do you guys plan the same for the db files? (merging deps and desc entries) Patch already available and running on my system! :P > tar -tf /home/arch/kernel64/kernel64.db bcm5974-2.6.37.3-1/ bcm5974-2.6.37.3-1/desc broadcom-wl-5.100.82.38-1/ broad

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:24:42 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: I guess to solve the first problem we would also need a pacman-db-downgrade script. >>> >>> pacman-db-downgrade would be basically impossible...  you could >>> symlink the desc f

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:50:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 17/03/11 06:39, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >>> You are right, I missed that. I have no idea how to fix the testing >>> host with extra chroot problem. Is there a way to detect when runn

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:50:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 17/03/11 06:39, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> You are right, I missed that. I have no idea how to fix the testing >> host with extra chroot problem. Is there a way to detect when running >> pacman-db-upgrade is needed? > > find /var/lib/pacman

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/16/2011 10:30 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 03/16/2011 09:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:46:21 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes: http://projects.archlinux.

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Allan McRae
On 17/03/11 06:39, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:30:47 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 03/16/2011 09:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:46:21 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any observations dealing with the upgr

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:30:47 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 03/16/2011 09:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:46:21 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: >>> Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any >>> observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes: >>> h

[arch-dev-public] devtools problem

2011-03-16 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 03/16/2011 09:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:46:21 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS Thanks to everyb