Re: [arch-dev-public] initscripts/mkinitcpio/netcfg maintenance

2010-12-04 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 03:11, Allan McRae wrote: > On 19/11/10 16:58, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> While looking through bugs for [core] packages, I notice that there are >> a large number of bug report for these three packages. In total they >> account for ~13% of the bugs in the tracker! >> >> First

Re: [arch-dev-public] initscripts/mkinitcpio/netcfg maintenance

2010-12-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.12.2010 02:11, schrieb Allan McRae: >> But given these are some of the uniqueness of Arch, I wonder what we _as >> a group_ could to do to improve this situation? Perhaps organize a >> hack-a-thon on IRC one day? Or we could advertise for help, with the >> selection criterion being a git repo

Re: [arch-dev-public] initscripts/mkinitcpio/netcfg maintenance

2010-12-02 Thread Allan McRae
On 19/11/10 16:58, Allan McRae wrote: While looking through bugs for [core] packages, I notice that there are a large number of bug report for these three packages. In total they account for ~13% of the bugs in the tracker! Firstly, I want to clarify that I'm not here to point fingers at anyone

[arch-dev-public] initscripts/mkinitcpio/netcfg maintenance

2010-11-18 Thread Allan McRae
While looking through bugs for [core] packages, I notice that there are a large number of bug report for these three packages. In total they account for ~13% of the bugs in the tracker! Firstly, I want to clarify that I'm not here to point fingers at anyone for not dealing with these bugs. W