Re: [arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild

2011-01-16 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.01.2011 19:24, schrieb Thomas Bächler: So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These packages don't as far as I can see: - libpcap - networkmanager These I didn't

Re: [arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild

2011-01-15 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.01.2011 19:24, schrieb Thomas Bächler: So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These seem to be okay, although I didn't try hostapd yet. These packages don't as far as I

[arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild

2011-01-13 Thread Thomas Bächler
So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These packages don't as far as I can see: - libpcap - networkmanager These I didn't check: - kismet - net-snmp - knemo - libvirt - simh Can the

Re: [arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild

2011-01-13 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 01/13/2011 08:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These packages don't as far as I can see: - libpcap - networkmanager nm doesn't support libnl

Re: [arch-dev-public] libnl 2.0 rebuild

2011-01-13 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.01.2011 19:46, schrieb Ionuț Bîru: nm doesn't support libnl 2.0 even in master. I think I'll port it and submit them a patch. From what I could see in iw and crda, this is rather easy. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature