See:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a
change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we
have split the big package into many small ones - that's okay. But y
Thomas Bächler schrieb:
See:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a
change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we
have split the big package into many smal
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> See:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
>
> Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a
> change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we
> have split the big pack
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
See:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a
change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we
have s
2009/10/1, Thomas Bächler :
> See:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Can you read Giovanni or Andrea?
You should SEE before to write, not after:
Author: andrea
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
Giovanni Scafora schrieb:
2009/10/1, Thomas Bächler :
See:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Can you read Giovanni or Andrea?
You should SEE before to write, not after:
Author: andrea
Yeah, sorry, I was looking at
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipe
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> It was partially broken before: ALL .xpi files have to be in
> noextract=(...) for it to make sense. And they must be extracted all
> separately, otherwise they will all have the same (wrong) .manifest file.
Ok, fixed.
What about "upgrade path"? Should I post
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
It was partially broken before: ALL .xpi files have to be in
noextract=(...) for it to make sense. And they must be extracted all
separately, otherwise they will all have the same (wrong) .manifest file.
Ok, fixed.
What about "upgra
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there.
added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum.
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there.
added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum.
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest
file. But I alr
Thomas Bächler schrieb:
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there.
added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum.
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest
> file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your
> original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code
> was there in the first place, and then d
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest
file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your
original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code
was there in the fir
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my screen
> today.
Luckily I am not the only one distracted today :)
Packages look good, users warned. Goodnight!
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my screen
today.
Luckily I am not the only one distracted today :)
Packages look good, users warned. Goodnight!
Good night to you too.
signature.asc
Description: O
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler wrote:
See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my
screen
today.
Luckily I am not the only one distracted today :)
Packages look good, users warned. Goodnight!
Good night to you too.
The
2009/10/1, Allan McRae :
> The pkgdesc's are still stupid
>
> > pacman -Ss thunderbird
> extra/thunderbird 2.0.0.23-1
>Standalone Mail/News reader
> extra/thunderbird-af 2.0.0.23-3
>Language packs for Thunderbird
> extra/thunderbird-be 2.0.0.23-3
>Language packs for Thunderbird
Allan McRae schrieb:
The pkgdesc's are still stupid
> pacman -Ss thunderbird
extra/thunderbird 2.0.0.23-1
Standalone Mail/News reader
extra/thunderbird-af 2.0.0.23-3
Language packs for Thunderbird
extra/thunderbird-be 2.0.0.23-3
Language packs for Thunderbird
extra/thunderbird-bg 2
On 02/10/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> Andrea, you have to add an appropriate pkgdesc for all of the
> package_thunderbird-* functions.
Yes I know...I only forgot they yesterday.
Added groups=('thunderbird-i18n') to -4 too. I am uploading they.
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On 02/10/2009, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
Andrea, you have to add an appropriate pkgdesc for all of the
package_thunderbird-* functions.
Yes I know...I only forgot they yesterday.
Added groups=('thunderbird-i18n') to -4 too. I am uploading they.
As a hint for
20 matches
Mail list logo
