Can someone explain this to me:
1) Check available versions
$ pacman -Si kdepim | grep Version
Version: 3.5.9-2
Version: 3.5.9.20080501-0.1
Ok, which version is newest?
$ vercmp '3.5.9-2' '3.5.9.20080501-0.1'
-1
Hmmm
$ vercmp
usage: vercmp
return values:
< 0 : if ver1 < ver
2008/5/6 Jan Spakula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> While I see you here, about something I've seen you post a comment
> about:
> Is it advisable to use "arch=('any')" for packages that are architecure
> independent, or was that just a momentary hype some time ago?
No, I wrote it _ISN'T_ advisable use
Excerpts from bash.lnx's message of Mon May 05 18:52:29 -0500 2008:
> 2008/5/6 Jan Spakula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to ask for rdup in AUR to be orphaned, so that I can
> > maintain it:
> Done
Thanks!
While I see you here, about something I've seen you post a comment
2008/5/6 Jan Spakula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask for rdup in AUR to be orphaned, so that I can
> maintain it:
> 1) it's out-of-date (version 0.5.2, current 0.5.7; considerable (for
> me) improvements)
> 2) the maintainer (dice) has the last appearance in AUR on 1
Hello,
I would like to ask for rdup in AUR to be orphaned, so that I can
maintain it:
1) it's out-of-date (version 0.5.2, current 0.5.7; considerable (for
me) improvements)
2) the maintainer (dice) has the last appearance in AUR on 1/14/2008
3) he does not respond to comments in AUR and his
* Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Montag, 5. Mai 2008 08:12 Tino Reichardt wrote:
>
> > Admin of an important server != admin of some private notebook ;)
>
> I want only to show that at the end everybody is an admin but okay i stop
> joking.-)
Okay, I am sorry too. I thought you meant thi
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just realized that, for some squirrely reason, I am currently
> > "maintaining" libcap. I have no freakin' clue what libcap even is. I
> > just got a flag-out-of-date version
Travis Willard wrote:
Hey guys,
I just realized that, for some squirrely reason, I am currently
"maintaining" libcap. I have no freakin' clue what libcap even is. I
just got a flag-out-of-date version asking if we should update it to
libcap2, which seems reasonable, as it's nice and shiny-new.
On Montag, 5. Mai 2008 08:12 Tino Reichardt wrote:
> I asked that: "Should I build a new package ?"
Sorry, i overread this.
> Admin of an important server != admin of some private notebook ;)
I want only to show that at the end everybody is an admin but okay i stop
joking.-)
See you, Attila
my wireless router is using wpa2-personal with aes encryption.
root /etc/network.d # iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:28:34:A3:E8:1B
ESSID:"casa"
Mode:Master
Channel:11
Freq
I created a firefox-spell-pt-br package to firefox3 (from [unstable]) and it
is working. The firefox3 of [unstable] is still in /opt/mozilla. This is the
only difference.
Below is the PKGBUILD:
# Contributor: Hugo Doria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pkgname=firefox-spell-pt-br
pkgver=3.0b5
pkgrel=1
pkgdes
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 11:48:52 +0300
>
> Right. I plan on going through the bug tracker more often, but it would
> be a waste of time if I comment on all the bugs but they never get
> closed. So I will focus my efforts on bugs that
On Mon, 5 May 2008 11:48:52 +0300
"Grigorios Bouzakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already did go through many bug reports/feature requests yesterday
> and requested closure on the ones that seemed to be fixed/no longer an
> issue. Also commented on the ones that were potentialy solved to
> mot
On 5/3/08, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey there. I was just browsing the bug tracker and I noticed some open
> bug reports:
>
> 7 reported in 0.7 Wombat
> 10 reported in 0.7.1 Noodle
> 58 reported in 0.7.2 Gimmick
> 18 reported in 0.8 Voodoo
> I'd love to help but obviously patches can
14 matches
Mail list logo
