[arch-general] Xorg & network problem

2008-05-07 Thread Lin, Zihui
Hi, Arch install is graceful.After "pacman -S xorg gnome", the startx brought me to gnome. everygthing seem fine till I quited X by Ctrl+Alt+BackSpace, After a while i tried to re-startx and just had no response. No message is shown and the X won't show up.The .xinitrc is clean, and the xorg.con

Re: [arch-general] Compiling my own kernel: IDE, SATA...

2008-05-07 Thread Carotinho
Hi! Il Wednesday 07 May 2008 21:40:29 Michal Soltys ha scritto: > In most simple words - when you compile your kernel, exclude > 'ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support' completely. > > Make sure 'SCSI device support' is in sane condition, and select > whatever you need from 'Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA

Re: [arch-general] pacman changes libcrypt.so.1 symlink

2008-05-07 Thread Alec Hussey
I had this same exact problem while either upgrading or installing a package(s) and I simply removed it (which I was almost sure would break something anyway) and reran pacman and it seemed to work fine. Although I probably wouldnt recommend doing it because it could possibly affect one package dif

Re: [arch-general] Compiling my own kernel: IDE, SATA...

2008-05-07 Thread Michal Soltys
Carotinho wrote: Hi! The main question is: how can I obtain the "right" behaviour from my own compiled kernel? Is this due to some misconfiguration of the kernel at compile-time, or is it obtained through some other kind of magic? The real problem here is that I cannot give a name to this pro

Re: [arch-general] pacman changes libcrypt.so.1 symlink

2008-05-07 Thread RedShift
Xavier wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: Hi I don't know if it's bug or feature, but it makes me crazy. It begun probably after some pacman upgrade. I'm using blowfish passwords with my archlinux, so my /lib/libcrypt.so.1 points to libxcrypt.so.1 instead of libcrypt-2.7.so from glibc. In my pacman.c

Re: [arch-general] pacman changes libcrypt.so.1 symlink

2008-05-07 Thread Xavier
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: Hi I don't know if it's bug or feature, but it makes me crazy. It begun probably after some pacman upgrade. I'm using blowfish passwords with my archlinux, so my /lib/libcrypt.so.1 points to libxcrypt.so.1 instead of libcrypt-2.7.so from glibc. In my pacman.conf I have NoEx

Re: [arch-general] Compiling my own kernel: IDE, SATA...

2008-05-07 Thread Geir Arveschoug Erikstad
I found this in the Official Arch Linux Install Guide on the wiki: "With the current kernel, an important change has been introduced pertaining to the ATA/IDE subsystem. The new pata (Parallel ATA) drivers replace the legacy IDE subsystem, and one important change is that the naming scheme for IDE

Re: [arch-general] Compiling my own kernel: IDE, SATA...

2008-05-07 Thread Ryan Sims
At a guess, it sounds like arch is loading a module that's a specific driver for your chipset, while your own kernel is using the generic ata drivers. Take a look at the output of hwd, lspci and such. You also might get some mileage out of googling your motherboard, or poke around on the forums (

[arch-general] Compiling my own kernel: IDE, SATA...

2008-05-07 Thread Carotinho
Hi! I'm sure this is an already answered question, but the problem is that I don't know which could be the question whose answer I'm in need of:) After this prologue, the problem is: The currently running system, with the Arch-supplied 2.6.24 kernel, has the disk devices all mapped to a /dev/sd

[arch-general] pacman changes libcrypt.so.1 symlink

2008-05-07 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi I don't know if it's bug or feature, but it makes me crazy. It begun probably after some pacman upgrade. I'm using blowfish passwords with my archlinux, so my /lib/libcrypt.so.1 points to libxcrypt.so.1 instead of libcrypt-2.7.so from glibc. In my pacman.conf I have NoExtract = lib/libcrypt.so